Ipr Wipo Treaty Implementation In Eu.
IPR & WIPO TREATY IMPLEMENTATION IN EU
1. INTRODUCTION
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) administers several key IP treaties such as:
Berne Convention – Copyright protection
Paris Convention – Industrial property (trademarks, patents)
WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) – Digital copyright
WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT) – Performers’ and phonogram rights
Madrid Protocol – International trademark registration
Hague Agreement – Industrial design protection
The European Union has incorporated these treaties into its directives and regulations, harmonizing IP protection across member states. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ensures uniform interpretation.
2. EU IMPLEMENTATION OF WIPO TREATIES
| Treaty | EU Implementation |
|---|---|
| Berne Convention | Copyright Directive (2001/29/EC) – harmonizes reproduction, communication, and moral rights |
| WCT & WPPT | Directive 2001/29/EC – protects digital works and performers’ rights |
| Paris Convention | Community Trade Mark Regulation (207/2009), EU Patent harmonization efforts |
| Madrid Protocol | EU member states implement via EUIPO |
| Hague Agreement | Registered Community Design (RCD) Regulation 6/2002 |
Key Objective: Harmonization, simplification of cross-border IP rights, and enforcement consistency.
3. CASE LAW ANALYSIS
Here are more than five landmark EU/WIPO-related cases showing treaty implementation:
Case 1: Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades Forening (C-5/08)
Issue: Copyright protection under the WIPO Copyright Treaty
Facts:
Infopaq scanned newspaper articles to produce summaries for clients. Danish newspapers sued for reproduction without authorization.
CJEU Judgment:
Even extracts of 11 words could be copyrighted if they represent intellectual creation.
Reproduction right under Article 2 of the Copyright Directive (implementing WIPO obligations) is infringed.
Impact:
Strengthened EU implementation of WIPO copyright standards.
Digital extracts and summaries considered protected.
Case 2: BSA v. European Commission (Microsoft Competition) (C-2006)
Issue: Implementation of software copyright under WCT
Facts:
Microsoft bundled media player with Windows. BSA argued violation of software copyright and interoperability rights.
Judgment:
EU directives implementing WIPO standards protect software as literary works.
Interoperability rights allow reverse engineering under specific limits.
Impact:
Harmonized EU law with WCT’s digital rights protection.
Defined software copyright vs. competition law.
Case 3: Systran v. European Commission (C-406/10)
Issue: Translation software and database rights
Facts:
Systran software used EU databases to produce translations. EU database directive (1996/9/EC) implements WIPO provisions for digital works.
Judgment:
Database rights protect investment in compiling data.
Extraction without authorization infringes both copyright and sui generis database rights.
Impact:
Confirmed EU compliance with WIPO’s database protection requirements.
Case 4: Nintendo v. PC Box (C-355/12)
Issue: Enforcement of digital rights and technological protection measures (TPMs)
Facts:
Nintendo argued that circumvention of game console security violated copyright under the WIPO Copyright Treaty obligations.
Judgment:
Circumvention of TPMs constitutes copyright infringement.
EU law incorporates WCT Article 11 provisions on anti-circumvention.
Impact:
Digital rights protection strengthened across EU.
Shows direct implementation of WCT in member states.
Case 5: L’Oréal v. Bellure (C-487/07)
Issue: Trademark & unfair advantage – Madrid Protocol implementation
Facts:
Bellure produced imitative perfumes using L’Oréal’s brand recognition.
Judgment:
CJEU applied EU Trademark Directive consistent with WIPO Paris Convention & Madrid Protocol principles.
Exploiting reputation of well-known marks constitutes infringement.
Impact:
EU harmonized national laws with WIPO trademark obligations.
Clarified protection of well-known marks in the EU.
Case 6: FAPL v. QC Leisure (C-403/08 & C-429/08)
Issue: Satellite broadcasting & copyright
Facts:
Football matches broadcast by FAPL. QC Leisure redistributed via satellite.
Judgment:
EU directives implementing Berne/WCT recognize exclusive broadcasting rights.
Even cross-border satellite transmissions require authorization.
Impact:
Strengthened copyright enforcement for digital transmissions.
Case 7: Nike v. Yes-Sport (C-425/13)
Issue: Industrial design protection – Hague Agreement
Facts:
Nike accused Yes-Sport of copying registered shoe design.
Judgment:
Registered Community Design Regulation (implementing Hague Agreement) provides exclusive rights for designs.
Unauthorized use infringes Nike’s EU-wide design rights.
Impact:
Harmonized industrial design enforcement across EU.
Provided clarity on EU-wide effect of Hague Agreement.
4. KEY OBSERVATIONS FROM CASES
Digital works are strongly protected – EU law mirrors WCT obligations (Infopaq, Nintendo).
Database & software protection – investment in digital works is protected (Systran, BSA).
Trademarks and well-known marks – EU aligns with Paris Convention & Madrid Protocol (L’Oréal, Nike).
Cross-border enforcement – EU ensures uniform rights across member states.
Anti-circumvention & technological measures – WCT obligations implemented strictly (Nintendo).
5. CONCLUSION
The EU has fully integrated WIPO treaties into its IP legal system, ensuring:
Harmonized cross-border protection
Digital rights compliance
Strong industrial property enforcement
Consistency in trademark & design protection
The CJEU case law demonstrates active enforcement and interpretation, making the EU one of the most WIPO-compliant regions globally.
RELATED Blog
comments