Ipr In Ip In Traditional Knowledge Protection.
Intellectual Property Rights in Traditional Knowledge Protection
Traditional Knowledge (TK) refers to knowledge, innovations, and practices of indigenous or local communities developed over centuries. This includes:
Medicinal knowledge
Agricultural practices and crop varieties
Folklore, songs, and cultural expressions
Craftsmanship and design techniques
IPR challenges with TK:
TK is communal and ancient, making novelty and individual ownership hard to establish
TK is often oral or undocumented, complicating patent protection
Misappropriation or “biopiracy” occurs when corporations patent TK without consent
Protection mechanisms for TK:
Sui generis systems – laws specifically protecting TK (e.g., India’s Traditional Knowledge Digital Library, TKDL)
Patents and copyrights – for documented TK, if novelty can be demonstrated
Geographical Indications (GIs) – protects region-specific products derived from TK
Trade secrets – for secret or proprietary traditional formulations
Key Legal Principles
Prior Art Recognition – TK constitutes prior art and can prevent wrongful patents
Disclosure Requirements – patent applications involving biological resources must disclose the source (e.g., India’s Biological Diversity Act)
Benefit Sharing – communities contributing TK should receive equitable benefits
International Agreements – TRIPS, CBD, and Nagoya Protocol encourage TK protection
Case Laws on TK Protection
Here are six landmark cases that illustrate how IP laws and TK protection intersect:
1. Turmeric Patent Case – EPO/US Patent Challenge (India, 1995)
Facts
An American company filed a patent in the US for the use of turmeric in wound healing. India’s Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) opposed, citing TK evidence in ancient texts.
Legal Issue
Whether prior knowledge in traditional texts invalidates a patent.
Judgment
US Patent was revoked due to prior art documented in traditional texts
Recognized that traditional knowledge is valid prior art
Significance
Landmark case preventing biopiracy of medicinal TK
Demonstrates the role of TKDL in protecting knowledge
2. Neem Tree Patent Case – European Patent Office (EPO, 2000)
Facts
A patent was granted in Europe for a process using neem tree extract as a pesticide. India challenged the patent using ancient knowledge.
Legal Issue
Whether patenting a process based on TK is valid.
Judgment
EPO revoked the patent
Traditional knowledge in Indian texts constituted prior art
Significance
Reinforced the need to recognize TK as prior art
Encouraged use of TKDL for patent oppositions
3. Basmati Rice Geographical Indication Case – India vs. USA (2002)
Facts
US companies attempted to patent “Basmati rice” varieties. India opposed under GI protection.
Legal Issue
Whether Basmati rice can be patented outside India.
Judgment
US patents were challenged and revoked
India registered Basmati rice as a Geographical Indication
Significance
Established GI protection as a tool for regional TK-based products
Prevented wrongful commercialization of traditional varieties
4. Hoodia Plant Patent Case – South Africa and Phytopharm (2003)
Facts
Phytopharm patented appetite-suppressing compounds derived from Hoodia, a plant traditionally used by the San community.
Legal Issue
Whether patenting TK-derived compounds without community consent is valid.
Judgment
Settlement required benefit-sharing with San community
Patent remained but with community royalties
Significance
First case enforcing equitable benefit sharing from TK
Highlighted ethical considerations in TK commercialization
5. Ayurvedic Knowledge & Patent Challenges – CSIR India (Multiple cases, 2000s)
Facts
CSIR used its Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) to challenge several patents in Europe and US on Ayurvedic formulations.
Legal Issue
Whether TKDL documentation can prevent wrongful patent grants.
Judgment
Multiple patents were revoked citing TKDL prior art
TKDL served as authoritative evidence for prior art
Significance
Showed importance of documenting TK digitally
Enhanced global recognition of traditional knowledge
6. Turmeric and Neem Litigation in India and Abroad (Consolidated 2000-2010)
Facts
Various companies attempted to patent formulations based on turmeric and neem for medicinal and agricultural use.
Legal Issue
Whether TK-based inventions can be patented without prior knowledge consideration.
Judgment
Multiple patents revoked in US, Europe, and India
Courts emphasized that TK constitutes global prior art
Significance
Strengthened India’s position in preventing biopiracy
Encouraged documentation and digitalization of TK
Key Takeaways
Traditional Knowledge is a valid form of prior art in patent law.
Geographical Indications protect TK-based regional products.
Digital documentation like TKDL enhances enforceability and global recognition.
Benefit-sharing arrangements are essential when TK is commercialized.
Legal strategies combining IP law, documentation, and TK foresight can prevent biopiracy and promote sustainable innovation.
Overall: Protecting TK under IPR requires a combination of patent opposition, GI registration, documentation, and benefit-sharing agreements, ensuring traditional communities benefit from their centuries-old knowledge.
RELATED Blog
comments