Ipr In Digital Fashion.
1. Meaning of Digital Fashion
Digital fashion refers to fashion products that exist wholly or primarily in digital form, including:
Virtual clothing and accessories
Wearables for avatars in games and metaverse platforms
NFT-based fashion items
Augmented reality (AR) try-ons
Digitally designed garments later manufactured physically
Digital fashion merges technology, creativity, and commerce, raising complex IPR issues because traditional laws were designed for physical goods.
2. Forms of IPR Applicable to Digital Fashion
(a) Copyright
Protects:
Digital sketches
3D garment designs
Fashion illustrations
Digital prints and textures
NFTs as artistic works
(b) Design Law
Protects:
Shape, configuration, pattern, ornamentation
Applies when digital designs are industrially applied
(c) Trademark
Protects:
Brand names
Logos
Trade dress
Virtual brand identity (metaverse stores, avatars)
(d) Patent
Protects:
Fashion tech innovations (smart wearables, AR try-ons, blockchain authentication)
3. Key Legal Challenges in Digital Fashion
Easy copying and reproduction of digital designs
Design vs copyright overlap
Unauthorized use in gaming platforms and metaverse
NFT resale and ownership confusion
Enforcement across borders and virtual platforms
4. Landmark Case Laws Relevant to Digital Fashion
Case 1: Ritika Private Limited v. Biba Apparels (Delhi High Court)
Facts
Ritika claimed copyright over dress designs and sketches
Biba reproduced similar designs in mass-produced garments
Legal Issue
Whether fashion designs enjoy copyright protection once applied industrially.
Decision
Court held that Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act applies
Once a design is:
Capable of being registered under the Designs Act, and
Applied industrially more than 50 times
→ copyright ceases
Relevance to Digital Fashion
Digital sketches lose copyright protection once converted into mass-produced garments
Designers must rely on design registration for digital-to-physical fashion
Significance
Most cited case on copyright–design overlap
Warns digital fashion designers to register designs early
Case 2: Christian Louboutin v. Nakul Bajaj (Delhi High Court)
Facts
Defendant sold products using Christian Louboutin’s red sole mark on an online platform
Legal Issue
Liability for trademark infringement in digital marketplaces
Decision
Court recognized red sole as a well-known trademark
Online platforms can be liable if they:
Facilitate infringement
Do not exercise due diligence
Relevance to Digital Fashion
Applies to:
Virtual fashion marketplaces
Metaverse fashion stores
NFT resale platforms
Significance
Protects luxury digital fashion branding
Establishes accountability of digital intermediaries
Case 3: Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands (US Supreme Court – Persuasive Value in India)
Facts
Dispute over copyright in graphic designs on cheerleading uniforms
Legal Issue
Can artistic elements of clothing be copyrighted separately?
Decision
Court held:
If a design feature can exist independently as art, it is copyrightable
Relevance to Digital Fashion
Digital prints, textures, patterns on virtual garments can enjoy separate copyright
Influences Indian courts in digital fashion disputes
Significance
Supports copyright protection for digital surface designs
Case 4: Puma SE v. Forever 21 (Trade Dress & Digital Promotion Case)
Facts
Puma alleged copying of its distinctive footwear design
Infringement occurred through online marketing and digital catalogues
Legal Issue
Whether digital display of fashion products constitutes infringement
Decision
Court recognized trade dress protection
Digital advertising and online representation can infringe IP rights
Relevance to Digital Fashion
Virtual garments and avatars displaying copied designs can infringe
Digital representation ≠ immunity from IP liability
Significance
Expands IP enforcement into digital fashion marketing
Case 5: Louis Vuitton v. My Other Bag
Facts
Defendant sold bags parodying Louis Vuitton designs
Legal Issue
Trademark infringement vs artistic expression
Decision
Parody allowed, but:
Only when it does not cause confusion
Does not dilute brand value
Relevance to Digital Fashion
NFTs and digital fashion art using luxury branding must avoid:
Consumer confusion
Commercial exploitation
Significance
Important for NFT fashion designers and digital artists
Case 6: Hermès v. Rothschild (MetaBirkin NFT Case)
Facts
Digital artist created and sold MetaBirkin NFTs
Hermès claimed trademark infringement and dilution
Legal Issue
Use of luxury trademarks in NFTs and virtual fashion
Decision
Court held that:
NFTs using brand names commercially can infringe trademarks
Artistic freedom does not justify misleading commercial use
Relevance to Digital Fashion
Directly applies to:
NFT fashion
Metaverse branding
Virtual luxury goods
Significance
First major NFT fashion trademark case
Sets precedent for virtual fashion enforcement
Case 7: Microsoft v. Motorola (Patent & Digital Tech Relevance)
Facts
Dispute over patents essential to digital standards
Relevance
Influences patent licensing in:
Smart clothing
Wearable tech
AR/VR fashion platforms
Significance
Highlights role of patents in fashion technology ecosystems
5. Comparative Protection of Digital Fashion
| IP Right | What It Protects | Application to Digital Fashion |
|---|---|---|
| Copyright | Digital art, 3D designs | Sketches, NFTs, virtual garments |
| Design | Visual appearance | Digitally designed garments |
| Trademark | Brand identity | Metaverse stores, logos, avatars |
| Patent | Technical innovation | Smart wearables, AR try-ons |
6. Key Legal Principles Emerging
Digital fashion designs are protectable IP
Copyright may cease after industrial application
Trademarks extend into virtual worlds
NFTs do not override IP ownership
Digital platforms may be secondarily liable
Designers must adopt multi-layer IP protection
7. Conclusion
Digital fashion represents the future of the fashion industry, but it brings complex IP challenges. Courts increasingly recognize that:
Virtual use is real use
Digital infringement is real infringement
IP laws must evolve to protect creativity in metaverse, NFTs, and AR fashion
Strategic use of copyright, design registration, trademarks, and patents is essential for digital fashion creators and brands.
RELATED Blog
comments