Ipr In AI-Assisted Blockchain Cybersecurity Patents.
IPR IN AI-ASSISTED BLOCKCHAIN CYBERSECURITY PATENTS
What is being protected?
In AI-assisted blockchain cybersecurity, patents usually claim:
AI models detecting intrusions, fraud, or anomalies
Blockchain-based secure transaction validation
Cryptographic key management using AI
Smart-contract vulnerability detection
Distributed ledger security architectures
The IP challenge is that these inventions combine:
Abstract algorithms (AI models)
Mathematical methods (cryptography)
Software code
Distributed computer systems (blockchain)
Patent law traditionally excludes abstract ideas, so courts examine:
Whether the invention is technical
Whether it produces a technical effect
Whether it is merely automation of human intelligence
KEY LEGAL ISSUES
Patent eligibility of AI algorithms
Patentability of blockchain as a system
Cybersecurity as a “technical solution”
Inventorship when AI assists human inventors
Scope and enforcement of software patents
DETAILED CASE LAWS
1. Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International (2014, US Supreme Court)
Facts
Alice Corp owned patents covering a computer-implemented method for mitigating settlement risk in financial transactions using a third-party intermediary.
Issue
Are computer-implemented financial methods patentable?
Held
❌ Not patentable.
The Court introduced the two-step test:
Is the claim directed to an abstract idea?
If yes, does it add an “inventive concept” transforming it into patent-eligible subject matter?
Relevance to AI-Blockchain Cybersecurity
Many blockchain cybersecurity patents fail if they merely implement known security concepts using software
AI detecting fraud on a blockchain must go beyond data analysis
The invention must improve computer security itself, not just automate decisions
Legal Principle
Merely using a computer (or blockchain) to perform an abstract idea is not patentable.
2. Enfish LLC v. Microsoft Corp. (2016, US Federal Circuit)
Facts
Enfish patented a self-referential database architecture that improved computer performance.
Issue
Is software that improves computer functionality patent-eligible?
Held
✅ Patentable.
The court held that the invention was not abstract because it improved how computers store and retrieve data.
Relevance to AI-Blockchain Cybersecurity
AI models improving blockchain node efficiency or security protocols may qualify
Cybersecurity patents focusing on technical improvement in network resilience are favored
Legal Principle
Software is patentable if it improves the functioning of a computer or network.
3. McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games (2016)
Facts
McRO developed an algorithm automating facial animations using rules instead of human animators.
Issue
Is automation of human activity patentable?
Held
✅ Patentable.
The court ruled that the invention used specific technical rules, not abstract ideas.
Relevance to AI-Blockchain Cybersecurity
AI-driven threat detection replacing human analysts can be patented
Claims must define specific training rules, architectures, or data handling steps
Legal Principle
Automation is patentable when it uses specific technical processes rather than generic AI.
4. DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com (2014)
Facts
DDR patented a system that prevented website visitors from being redirected away during online transactions.
Issue
Does solving an internet-specific problem make software patentable?
Held
✅ Patentable.
The invention solved a problem unique to the internet.
Relevance to AI-Blockchain Cybersecurity
Blockchain-specific attacks (51% attack detection, smart contract exploits) are internet-native problems
AI detecting blockchain consensus manipulation fits this category
Legal Principle
Solutions to problems unique to digital networks are patent-eligible.
5. Thales Visionix Inc. v. United States (2017)
Facts
Thales patented a system for tracking objects using inertial sensors and mathematical equations.
Issue
Are mathematical formulas patentable?
Held
✅ Patentable because the formulas were used in a physical, technical system.
Relevance to AI-Blockchain Cybersecurity
Cryptographic algorithms + AI models are mathematical
When tied to distributed ledger security hardware or nodes, they become patentable
Legal Principle
Mathematical methods become patentable when applied to a concrete technical system.
6. SAP America v. InvestPic (2018)
Facts
InvestPic patented statistical methods for analyzing financial data.
Issue
Are data-processing AI models patentable?
Held
❌ Not patentable.
The invention merely used mathematical analysis on data.
Relevance to AI-Blockchain Cybersecurity
AI models analyzing blockchain transaction data must do more than analytics
Security enforcement or prevention mechanisms are crucial
Legal Principle
Data analysis alone is not enough—there must be a technical effect.
7. DABUS Patent Applications (UK, EPO, US)
Facts
Patent applications listed an AI system (DABUS) as the inventor.
Issue
Can AI be an inventor?
Held
❌ No. Only natural persons can be inventors.
Relevance to AI-Blockchain Cybersecurity
AI-assisted inventions must name human inventors
Ownership belongs to AI developers or users, not the AI system
Legal Principle
AI may assist invention, but inventorship remains human.
SYNTHESIS: HOW THESE CASES SHAPE AI-BLOCKCHAIN CYBERSECURITY PATENTS
| Aspect | Legal Standard |
|---|---|
| AI Algorithms | Must have technical specificity |
| Blockchain | Must solve a network-specific problem |
| Cybersecurity | Must improve system security |
| Inventorship | Humans only |
| Cryptography | Patentable when applied technically |
CONCLUSION
AI-assisted blockchain cybersecurity patents are:
Not automatically excluded
Highly scrutinized
Strongest when they:
Improve network security
Prevent attacks, not just detect them
Are deeply tied to blockchain infrastructure
RELATED Blog
comments