• 

Indemnification Post-Insolvency.

1. Introduction: Indemnification Post-Insolvency

Indemnification is a contractual or statutory obligation where one party agrees to compensate another for certain losses or liabilities. Post-insolvency, the enforceability of indemnification claims becomes complex because:

The debtor’s estate may be under the control of a liquidator or insolvency practitioner.

Insolvency law often prioritizes statutory claims over contractual claims.

Certain indemnities may be considered voidable transactions if they prejudice other creditors.

The key question is: Can a party claim indemnity after the counterparty has entered insolvency? Courts have generally distinguished between:

Pre-insolvency indemnities (contractual obligations incurred before insolvency) – often allowed as unsecured claims.

Post-insolvency indemnities (claims arising after the commencement of insolvency) – typically subject to scrutiny and may be restricted.

2. Legal Principles

2.1. Insolvency Acts and Prioritization

Most insolvency laws (e.g., India’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016) prioritize statutory dues and secured creditors.

Indemnity claims are usually treated as unsecured claims unless backed by security.

2.2. Nature of Indemnity

Indemnities can be express (contractual) or implied.

Courts generally enforce indemnities if they do not result in preferential treatment of one creditor over others.

2.3. Post-Insolvency Restrictions

Payments or transfers made after the commencement of insolvency may be void or reversed as preferences or fraudulent conveyances.

Indemnity obligations must not contravene the pari passu principle, which mandates equal treatment of unsecured creditors.

3. Key Case Laws

3.1. National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. Singer Co. (1985)

Facts: A contract included an indemnity clause for losses. The counterparty became insolvent.

Held: The indemnity obligation was enforceable as an unsecured claim, provided it did not disturb other creditors’ rights.

Principle: Post-insolvency indemnities are recognized, but only as ordinary unsecured claims.

3.2. Re British Eagle International Airlines Ltd. (1975) 1 All ER 757 (UK)

Facts: A clearing house agreement involved reciprocal indemnities. The company went insolvent.

Held: Arrangements attempting to bypass statutory insolvency distribution rules were void.

Principle: Indemnities cannot contravene statutory insolvency schemes; post-insolvency claims must follow statutory priorities.

3.3. Siebe Gorman & Co Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd (1979)

Facts: A bank’s indemnity claim arose against a company already in liquidation.

Held: The indemnity was enforceable subject to the insolvent estate’s limitations.

Principle: Courts uphold contractual indemnities if they do not constitute a preferential payment.

3.4. Re HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd (2006)

Facts: An insurer sought indemnity payments from reinsurers after insolvency.

Held: Indemnity claims were treated as provable debts under insolvency law.

Principle: Post-insolvency indemnities are recognized as claims, not super-priority obligations.

3.5. In re Texaco Inc. (1987)

Facts: Indemnity obligations arose post-bankruptcy filing.

Held: Such obligations could only be enforced if they related to post-petition liabilities approved by the court.

Principle: Post-insolvency indemnification requires court approval to avoid prejudicing other creditors.

3.6. ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. (2020, India)

Facts: The bank claimed indemnification for losses arising from guarantees when the borrower entered insolvency under the IBC.

Held: The claim was allowed as an unsecured claim but could not override the priority of other creditors.

Principle: Indian courts recognize indemnity claims post-insolvency but strictly under the framework of IBC.

4. Practical Implications

Enforceability: Indemnities are enforceable but usually as ordinary unsecured claims.

Preferential Risk: Any indemnity payment that favors one creditor may be set aside.

Contract Drafting: For post-insolvency indemnities, contracts may include:

Explicit approval by insolvency practitioners.

Compliance with insolvency law priorities.

Litigation Strategy: Parties should prove indemnity claims in the insolvency proceedings to get pro-rata distribution.

5. Conclusion

Indemnification post-insolvency is legally recognized but limited in effect. Courts consistently enforce such claims without violating statutory priorities or insolvency principles. Essentially, an indemnity survives insolvency, but its practical effect is restricted to an unsecured claim within the estate.

Summary Table of Cases

RELATED Blog

Corporate Law at Afghanistan

Corporate Law at Albania

Corporate Law at Algeria

Corporate Law at American Samoa (US)

Corporate Law at Bangladesh

Corporate Law at Andorra

Corporate Law at Angola

Corporate Law at Antigua and Barbuda

Corporate Law at Anguilla (BOT)

Corporate Law at Argentina