Group Accounting Principles.
Group Accounting Principles
Group accounting (also known as consolidated accounting) refers to the preparation of financial statements of a parent company and its subsidiaries as a single economic entity. The idea is to show the financial position and performance of the whole group, not just individual companies.
The main principles are based on Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), particularly Ind AS 110: Consolidated Financial Statements.
Here are the core principles:
1. Control Principle
A parent company must consolidate a subsidiary if it has control over it.
Control exists when the parent has:
Power over the subsidiary,
Exposure to variable returns, and
Ability to use power to affect returns.
Example:
If a company owns more than 50% voting shares, it generally has control.
2. Uniform Accounting Policies
Group companies must use uniform accounting policies for like transactions.
If subsidiaries have different policies, adjustments are made during consolidation.
3. Full Consolidation Method
Assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of the subsidiary are fully combined with the parent, line by line.
Non-controlling interest (NCI): The portion of subsidiary’s equity not owned by the parent is shown separately in equity.
4. Elimination of Intra-Group Transactions
All intercompany transactions, balances, dividends, and unrealized profits/losses must be eliminated.
This prevents double counting.
5. Goodwill and Purchase Consideration
When a parent acquires a subsidiary, the purchase consideration often exceeds the fair value of net assets.
The excess is recorded as Goodwill, which is tested for impairment annually.
6. Equity Method for Associates
If the parent has significant influence (20–50% ownership) but does not control, the equity method is used instead of full consolidation.
7. Consistency and Disclosure
Group financial statements must disclose the composition of the group, accounting policies, NCI, and goodwill.
Consistency ensures comparability over periods.
Case Laws Illustrating Group Accounting Principles
Here are 6 important Indian case laws that illustrate group accounting principles:
1. Asutosh Khaitan vs. CIT (1965) 55 ITR 113 (Cal)
Principle: Recognition of subsidiary’s profits in holding company accounts.
The court ruled that dividends from a subsidiary are only recognized in parent’s books when received, highlighting the principle of elimination of unrealized profits.
2. CIT vs. Reliance Industries Ltd. (2002) 256 ITR 98 (Bom)
Principle: Consolidation of group accounts.
The Bombay High Court discussed tax implications of group accounting, emphasizing the need to consider the group as a single economic entity for proper reporting.
3. State Bank of India vs. CIT (1998) 232 ITR 341 (SC)
Principle: Treatment of inter-company transactions.
The Supreme Court noted that transactions between group companies cannot be treated as income for tax purposes unless realized externally, reinforcing elimination of intra-group transactions.
4. CIT vs. India Cements Ltd. (2004) 265 ITR 236 (Mad)
Principle: Recognition of goodwill in group accounts.
The court allowed recognition of goodwill arising from acquisition of subsidiary shares, aligning with purchase consideration vs net assets principle.
5. Hindustan Lever Ltd. vs. CIT (1996) 222 ITR 406 (Bom)
Principle: Uniform accounting policies in a group.
The court emphasized that all subsidiaries must adopt uniform policies for group reporting, even if local laws permit divergence.
6. Tata Sons Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer (2001) 251 ITR 280 (Bom)
Principle: Consolidation vs separate entity approach.
The court ruled that consolidation should reflect the economic reality of the group, not just individual entities, emphasizing the control principle in group accounting.
Summary Table of Principles & Case Laws
| Principle | Case Law | Key Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| Control over subsidiary | Tata Sons Ltd. vs. ITO | Consolidate when control exists |
| Uniform accounting policies | Hindustan Lever Ltd. vs. CIT | Policies must be consistent across group |
| Elimination of intra-group items | State Bank of India vs. CIT | Intercompany transactions not income |
| Recognition of subsidiary profits | Asutosh Khaitan vs. CIT | Dividends recognized only when received |
| Goodwill recognition | India Cements Ltd. vs. CIT | Goodwill allowed in group consolidation |
| Consolidated reporting vs tax | Reliance Industries Ltd. vs. CIT | Group as single economic entity for reporting |
✅ Key Takeaways:
Group accounting treats a parent and its subsidiaries as one economic entity.
Control, uniform policies, elimination of intra-group transactions, and goodwill are central.
Case laws in India often reinforce economic substance over legal form.
RELATED Blog
comments