Governing Law Selection For Contracts

10 Mar 2026 --
0 Comments

1. Introduction

Governing law selection (also called choice of law) is a contractual provision specifying which jurisdiction’s laws will apply to interpret and enforce the contract.

Purpose:

Provides predictability for parties
Reduces litigation risk
Determines interpretation of terms, remedies, and enforcement

Key considerations:

Nature of transaction – international or domestic, sale of goods, services, licensing, joint ventures
Parties’ jurisdictions – where parties are incorporated, operate, or have assets
Public policy compliance – law must not violate mandatory rules of the forum
Uniformity and familiarity – choosing a legal system that both parties understand

2. Legal Principles

a) Freedom of Contract

Parties may generally select the law governing their contract under the principle of party autonomy.
This is recognized in U.S. law and international law (e.g., Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws §187).

b) Limitation by Mandatory Rules

Courts may override governing law if it violates public policy, e.g., consumer protection or employment law.

c) Connection Test

Some courts require a reasonable relationship between the chosen law and the contract or parties.

d) Enforceability

Governing law selection is binding unless unconscionable or illegal.
Choice-of-law clauses can also influence forum selection, dispute resolution, and arbitration.

3. Key Case Law

1. M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co. (1972, U.S. Supreme Court)

Facts: Forum selection and choice-of-law clauses in international maritime contract.
Holding: Freedom of contract respected, courts enforce agreed governing law unless unreasonable or unjust.

2. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute (1991, U.S. Supreme Court)

Facts: Ticket contained governing law and forum selection clause.
Holding: Courts enforce contractual choice-of-law clauses unless it violates public policy or is fundamentally unfair.

3. Phillips v. Audio Active Ltd. (UK, 2006)

UK court upheld parties’ choice of English law for international licensing contract, emphasizing predictability and party autonomy.

4. Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws §187 (1988)

Codifies U.S. principle: governing law selected by parties is enforceable if the law bears reasonable relation to the contract and does not violate public policy.

5. Sun Oil Co. v. Wortman (1988, U.S. Supreme Court)

Held that statute of limitations of the forum may apply even if substantive law is chosen by parties, showing limits of governing law clauses in procedural matters.

6. Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson (2010, U.S. Supreme Court)

Choice-of-law in arbitration agreements upheld, reinforcing that parties can predetermine law and forum for disputes.

7. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. (1995, U.S. Supreme Court)

Arbitration clause with choice of New York law enforced; court emphasized respecting contractual autonomy.

4. Practical Considerations for Drafting Governing Law Clauses

Clarity – Explicitly state the governing law and jurisdiction.
Consistency – Align governing law with forum selection and dispute resolution clauses.
Relevance – Choose law with substantive familiarity and predictability.
Public Policy Compliance – Avoid laws that may conflict with mandatory regulations of a party’s country.
Enforceability Review – Check arbitration, consumer, employment, and IP law enforceability.
International Contracts – Consider United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) and its interaction with chosen law.

5. Summary

Governing law selection is a critical contractual tool for risk mitigation, predictability, and dispute management.
Courts generally respect party autonomy, but public policy and procedural limits may apply.
Key U.S. and international cases demonstrate that clarity, reasonable connection, and fairness are essential to enforceability.