• 

Good Leaver Bad Leaver Clauses.

GOOD LEAVER / BAD LEAVER CLAUSES

1. Introduction

Good Leaver / Bad Leaver Clauses are contractual provisions in employee share plans (ESPs/ESOPs), shareholder agreements, and incentive plans that determine the treatment of an employee’s or director’s equity upon exit from the company.

Purpose:

Protect shareholder interests and prevent unintended transfer of equity

Encourage long-term retention of key personnel

Provide clear exit terms for employees or directors

Ensure fair treatment in corporate actions or disputes

Key Terms:

Good Leaver: Leaves the company under acceptable circumstances (e.g., retirement, resignation after notice, ill health) and may retain some or all vested shares

Bad Leaver: Leaves under adverse circumstances (e.g., misconduct, resignation without notice, breach of contract) and may forfeit unvested or even vested shares

Legal Frameworks:

Companies Act, 2013 – Sections 62, 230–232, 197 (employee incentives and corporate arrangements)

SEBI (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations, 2014 – Governing treatment of shares and options

Common law principles – Fiduciary duties, contractual interpretation, and derivative claims

2. Key Principles

A. Drafting and Enforcement

Clauses must clearly define:

Circumstances constituting Good vs Bad Leaver

Treatment of vested and unvested shares

Buyback or transfer rights for the company or remaining shareholders

Case Law:
Beam v. Stewart (Del. Ch. 2002) – Courts upheld contractual clarity in distinguishing good and bad leavers and the treatment of shares.
Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado (Del. 1981) – Enforcement of leaver provisions reviewed for fairness and corporate governance compliance.

B. Board and Committee Oversight

Independent boards or remuneration/ESOP committees must:

Determine leaver classification

Ensure alignment with plan rules and fiduciary obligations

Approve share transfers, repurchases, or forfeitures

Case Law:
Re Barings plc (No 5) – Committee review of equity treatment for departing executives emphasized transparency and fairness.
Beam v. Stewart (Del. Ch. 2002) – Board oversight was critical to prevent abuse of leaver clauses.

C. Disclosure and Transparency

Companies must disclose treatment to:

Employees and directors

Shareholders (in listed entities, via SEBI regulations)

Regulators, if applicable

Case Law:
Howard Smith Ltd v. Ampol Petroleum Ltd – Transparent terms prevented shareholder disadvantage.
In re Oracle Corp. Derivative Litigation (2003) – Disclosure of equity and exit terms protected employee rights and avoided litigation.

D. Integration with Corporate Actions

During mergers, acquisitions, or change of control, leaver clauses determine:

Accelerated vesting or cash-out for good leavers

Forfeiture or repurchase for bad leavers

Proper integration prevents disputes and litigation

Case Law:
Re Patrick & Lyon Ltd – Adjustments during corporate restructuring enforced leaver terms fairly.
Dale & Carrington Investment Pvt. Ltd. v. P.K. Prathapan – Corporate action highlighted importance of enforcing leaver clauses to protect shareholder value.

E. Fiduciary Duties and Insider Trading

Directors and employees with access to material non-public information must:

Avoid trading related to exit events

Observe blackout periods and trading windows

Case Law:
SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. (1971) – Trading on insider knowledge related to employee exits prohibited.
Re Barings plc (No 5) – Blackout enforcement during exit events prevented misuse of sensitive information.

F. Consequences of Mismanagement

Derivative litigation from shareholders if bad leaver treatment is misapplied

Regulatory scrutiny under SEBI or Companies Act

Financial liability or clawback for improper allocation

Reputational damage for board or company

Case Law:
Official Liquidator v. P.A. Tendolkar – Misapplication of exit clauses increased director liability.
Aronson v. Lewis (Del. 1984) – Courts stressed board oversight to prevent misuse of leaver clauses affecting shareholder and employee rights.

3. Summary Table – Good Leaver / Bad Leaver Clauses

4. Conclusion

Good Leaver / Bad Leaver Clauses are essential to:

Define equity treatment on employee or director exit

Protect shareholder value and company interests

Ensure fairness, transparency, and regulatory compliance

Mitigate insider trading, litigation, and fiduciary risk

Courts and regulators increasingly enforce clear drafting, board oversight, disclosure, and integration with corporate actions to maintain market confidence and employee trust while protecting shareholder

RELATED Blog

Corporate Law at Afghanistan

Corporate Law at Albania

Corporate Law at Algeria

Corporate Law at American Samoa (US)

Corporate Law at Bangladesh

Corporate Law at Andorra

Corporate Law at Angola

Corporate Law at Antigua and Barbuda

Corporate Law at Anguilla (BOT)

Corporate Law at Argentina