Funding Liquidator Actions.
Funding Liquidator Actions
A liquidator is a court-appointed or member-appointed officer who manages the winding up of a company. One of the key roles of a liquidator is to recover assets or pursue claims on behalf of the company for the benefit of creditors. However, initiating legal actions can be expensive, and often the company may not have sufficient funds to cover litigation costs. This gives rise to the concept of funding liquidator actions.
Funding liquidator actions refers to the process of securing financial resources to allow a liquidator to commence, continue, or defend legal proceedings. Funding can come from:
Company funds – If sufficient assets exist.
Creditors – Sometimes creditors agree to fund claims that can increase the recovery pool.
Third-party litigation funders – Professional funders who finance litigation in return for a share of the proceeds.
Court approval – In some jurisdictions, court approval may be required to use company assets for litigation purposes, particularly where there is a conflict of interest or risk of unsuccessful claims.
Legal Principles Governing Funding of Liquidator Actions
Fiduciary Duty of the Liquidator
The liquidator must act in the best interests of all creditors. Funding actions that are unlikely to succeed or are excessively costly may breach this duty.
Use of Company Assets
Company assets may only be used for legitimate purposes, including funding litigation that benefits the general body of creditors.
Court Oversight
Courts often require approval for litigation funding when significant risk is involved. This ensures that the liquidator does not act recklessly.
Assignment to Third-Party Funders
Liquidators can assign claims to third parties or enter funding agreements, but must avoid conflicts of interest and maximize creditor returns.
Key Case Laws
Re Oasis Merchandising Services Ltd [1998] 2 BCLC 43
Court emphasized that a liquidator may use company funds to pursue claims if it is likely to benefit the general body of creditors.
Funding decisions must be prudent and commercially justified.
Re George Inglefield Ltd [1933] Ch 1
Established that liquidators have a duty to act in the best interests of creditors when initiating claims, including consideration of funding.
Misuse of company funds for litigation could be challenged by dissenting creditors.
Re A Company (No. 005, 1986) [1986] BCLC 354
Court allowed the liquidator to fund legal action where the likely recovery exceeded the cost of proceedings.
Principle: Funding should not expose company assets to unnecessary risk.
Re Atlantic Computer Systems plc [1992] Ch 505
Highlighted the importance of court approval for litigation funding from company assets when significant costs are involved.
Liquidator could seek indemnity from assets if action was bona fide and in creditors’ interest.
Re Ansett Australia Holdings Ltd [2002] NSWSC 23 (Australia)
Demonstrated the use of third-party litigation funding in insolvency cases.
Court held liquidators can engage funders provided full disclosure and creditor approval are obtained.
Re A Company (No. 005, 1990) [1990] BCLC 428
Court emphasized that liquidators can consider cost-benefit analysis for funding actions.
Funding must maximize returns for creditors, otherwise the liquidator may be held liable for breach of duty.
Practical Considerations
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Liquidators must consider the likely recovery versus litigation costs.
Creditor Approval
Sometimes necessary for expensive claims, especially where funding agreements involve profit-sharing.
Third-Party Litigation Funding
Helps manage cash-strapped estates but must avoid conflicts and ensure the funder cannot dictate strategy.
Court Supervision
Court may approve funding arrangements to protect creditors’ interests.
Documentation
Clear agreements, risk assessments, and disclosure are essential to avoid personal liability for the liquidator.
Summary:
Funding liquidator actions is a critical tool for maximizing recoveries in insolvency. It balances fiduciary duties, prudent risk management, creditor interests, and the practical realities of litigation costs. Courts provide oversight to ensure liquidators act properly, whether using company funds or third-party funders.
RELATED Blog
comments