Employee Consent And Data Usage Governanc
I. Concept of Employee Consent and Data Governance
1. Meaning
Employee consent and data usage governance refers to the legal framework governing:
Collection, processing, storage, sharing, and retention of employee personal data
Conditions under which employer may rely on consent or non-consent grounds
Internal corporate controls to prevent misuse of employee data
In employment relationships, consent is treated with heightened scrutiny due to power imbalance.
II. Legal Framework Applicable to Employee Data
Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDP Act)
Constitution of India – Article 21 (Right to Privacy)
Industrial and labour jurisprudence
IT Act, 2000 (residual relevance)
III. Consent in Employment Context
1. Why Employee Consent Is Problematic
Employment contracts involve economic dependence
Consent may not be truly “free”
Courts and regulators therefore emphasise legitimate use rather than consent
Case Law 1: Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
Informational privacy is a fundamental right
Consent must be meaningful and not illusory
Power imbalance vitiates genuine choice
This principle directly shapes employee-data governance.
IV. Lawful Grounds for Processing Employee Data
Under DPDP Act, employers may process data for:
Employment-related purposes
Compliance with law
Protection of life and health
Legitimate business interest (as notified)
Consent is not the default legal basis in many HR scenarios.
V. Data Minimisation and Purpose Limitation
1. Corporate Obligations
Employers must:
Collect only necessary employee data
Use data only for specified purposes
Avoid secondary or unrelated use
Case Law 2: People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India
Excessive or indiscriminate data collection violates privacy
Procedural safeguards are mandatory
This informs limits on intrusive HR data practices.
VI. Monitoring, Surveillance and Workplace Privacy
1. Digital Monitoring
Includes:
CCTV surveillance
Email and device monitoring
Biometric attendance systems
Such measures must satisfy necessity and proportionality.
Case Law 3: Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Intrusive surveillance violates personal liberty
Privacy extends beyond physical spaces
Applied to workplace monitoring controls.
VII. Employee Data Disclosure and Confidentiality
1. Internal and External Disclosure
Employers must ensure:
Restricted access to employee data
Disclosure only on legal necessity
Protection against unauthorised sharing
Case Law 4: R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu
Unauthorised disclosure of personal information violates privacy
Individual controls dissemination of personal data
This underpins confidentiality obligations in HR governance.
VIII. Employee Rights Over Their Data
Employees are entitled to:
Access to their personal data
Correction and updating of inaccurate data
Erasure of data after purpose is fulfilled
Grievance redressal
Case Law 5: Canara Bank v. Union of India
Right to privacy includes protection of personal records
Even institutional environments cannot dilute privacy rights
Highly relevant to employee HR records and background checks.
IX. Biometric and Sensitive Employee Data
1. Heightened Safeguards
Biometric, health, and financial data require:
Strong security controls
Limited access
Defined retention periods
Case Law 6: Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Aadhaar – II)
Collection of biometric data demands strict necessity and proportionality
Purpose limitation is mandatory
This rationale directly applies to corporate biometric systems.
X. Data Retention and Exit Management
1. Post-Employment Data
Employers may retain data only:
For statutory or legal claims
For reasonable business necessity
Indefinite retention is prohibited.
Case Law 7: Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India
Any restriction on rights must be proportionate and time-bound
Open-ended measures are unconstitutional
Supports time-limited retention of employee data.
XI. Corporate Governance and Accountability
1. Employer as Data Fiduciary
Employers must:
Establish privacy policies
Appoint grievance officers
Train HR and IT teams
Conduct audits
Failure exposes companies to:
Monetary penalties
Employment disputes
Reputational damage
XII. Best Practices for Employee Data Governance
Separate consent from employment contracts
Rely on legitimate use where possible
Provide layered privacy notices
Restrict monitoring to business necessity
Encrypt and segregate sensitive data
Implement exit-stage data erasure protocols
XIII. Key Takeaways
Employee consent is legally fragile due to power imbalance.
DPDP Act prioritises lawful purpose over blanket consent.
Data minimisation and proportionality are central principles.
Workplace surveillance must be justified and transparent.
Employees retain privacy rights even within organisations.
Employee data governance is now a core HR and compliance function.
RELATED Blog
comments