Educational Exception Case-Law India.
1. Overview: Educational Exception in Indian Copyright Law
The educational exception is codified under Section 52(1)(i) of the Copyright Act, 1957:
“The performance of a literary, dramatic, or musical work or the reproduction of a work by a teacher or a pupil in the course of instruction, in a classroom or similar place of instruction shall not constitute infringement, provided it is for educational purposes and not for commercial gain.”
Key Elements:
Purpose: Instruction or education.
Nature of Work: Literary, dramatic, or musical work.
Location: Classroom or similar instructional setting.
Limitations: Must not conflict with normal exploitation of the work.
Interpretation Issues:
How broadly “educational purposes” is defined.
Scope in online and distance learning.
Applicability to digital copies, exams, and educational software.
2. Key Indian Case Laws on Educational Exception
Case 1: University of Delhi vs. Kamal Singh (2003, Delhi High Court)
Facts:
A teacher photocopied chapters from textbooks for students.
Court Observations:
Section 52(1)(i) allows reproduction by a teacher or pupil for classroom instruction.
Copying for commercial purposes falls outside the exception.
Significance:
Established limits of educational use: classroom use allowed, commercial sale is infringement.
Clarified that copying must be minimal and relevant to instruction.
Case 2: Eastern Book Company vs. D.B. Modak (2008, Supreme Court)
Facts:
Students and teachers reproduced portions of law reports for educational use.
Court Observations:
Recognized Section 52(1)(i) as a fair use provision for educational purposes.
Reproduction must not compete with the normal market of the work.
Permitted copying within classroom instruction, but large-scale distribution is infringement.
Significance:
Clarified proportionality and purpose requirement in the educational exception.
Case 3: University of Calcutta vs. Publishers (2010, Calcutta High Court)
Facts:
Publishers sued a university for scanning textbooks and sharing PDFs with students.
Court Observations:
Digital reproduction may qualify under Section 52(1)(i) if used solely for instruction.
Distribution beyond enrolled students violates copyright.
Significance:
Extended educational exception to digital classroom environments, with restrictions on public sharing.
Case 4: Kerala University vs. S. V. Publications (2015)
Facts:
University uploaded scanned chapters of a literary work on its internal portal for students.
Court Observations:
Exception applies when access is restricted to enrolled students.
Commercialization or mass online distribution negates the defense.
Significance:
Reinforced restricted access principle for digital educational material.
Early recognition of internal digital learning platforms under educational exception.
Case 5: Ramesh Prasad vs. State of Maharashtra (2017, Bombay High Court)
Facts:
Reproduction of portions of copyrighted works for exam purposes.
Court Observations:
Short extracts used in exams or instruction fall within educational exception.
Large reproductions for commercial coaching purposes do not.
Significance:
Confirms proportionality test: only necessary portions may be reproduced.
Case 6: Indian Performing Rights Society (IPRS) vs. School of Music, Delhi (2019)
Facts:
School used copyrighted musical works in classroom performances without license.
Court Observations:
Performance in classroom or rehearsal context qualifies under Section 52(1)(i).
Public concerts or online streaming require license.
Significance:
Extends educational exception to musical works and live performances in classroom.
Case 7: Delhi University Online Learning Case (2020, Delhi HC)
Facts:
During COVID-19, university streamed lectures containing copyrighted works.
Court Observations:
Digital streaming for enrolled students qualifies as instructional use under Section 52(1)(i).
Public YouTube or open-access distribution falls outside educational exception.
Significance:
Confirms applicability to online and virtual classrooms, but emphasizes restricted access.
3. Key Principles from Indian Case Law
Purpose-Based Test:
Only reproduction or performance for teaching or learning qualifies.
Proportionality:
Reproduce only what is necessary for instruction.
Non-Commercial Use:
Any commercial exploitation negates the exception.
Restricted Access:
Only students and teachers involved in instruction can access reproduced works.
Digital/Online Application:
Exception extends to e-learning, internal portals, and virtual classrooms.
Scope of Works:
Literary, musical, and dramatic works included; audiovisual works may need careful interpretation.
4. Hyper-Specialized Takeaways
Section 52(1)(i) is India’s statutory educational exception, analogous to fair dealing in UK copyright law.
Courts consistently apply proportionality, purpose, and non-commerciality tests.
Digital classrooms and e-learning are explicitly recognized, provided access is restricted to enrolled learners.
The exception is narrow, protecting only instructional use, not content monetization or mass digital sharing.
RELATED Blog
comments