Documentation Of Tk
1. Introduction to Traditional Knowledge (TK)
Traditional Knowledge (TK) refers to the knowledge, innovations, practices, and skills developed, sustained, and passed down by indigenous and local communities over generations.
TK can relate to:
Medicinal practices (e.g., Ayurveda, herbal remedies)
Agricultural practices (e.g., seed varieties, organic farming)
Handicrafts and cultural expressions
Food and cuisine
Purpose of documentation:
Prevent misappropriation or biopiracy
Support IP protection (patents, GIs, trademarks)
Preserve cultural heritage
Facilitate research and commercialization with benefit-sharing
2. Legal and Policy Framework in India
2.1 Biological Diversity Act, 2002
Section 2: Recognizes rights of local communities over traditional knowledge.
Section 36: Prior approval and benefit sharing for commercial use of TK.
2.2 Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001
Recognizes community rights over plant-related TK.
2.3 Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL)
Initiative by CSIR and Ministry of AYUSH
Converts classical texts of Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha, Yoga into a digital format.
Used to prevent wrongful patenting abroad.
2.4 Indian Patent Act, 1970 (as amended)
Section 3(p): Excludes traditional knowledge and discoveries from patentability.
Requires novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability for patent protection.
TK documentation serves as defensive protection to prevent misappropriation.
3. Steps for Documentation of TK
Collection
Gather information from local communities, ethnobotanical surveys, and classical texts.
Validation
Verify knowledge authenticity through experts.
Classification
Categorize based on use, region, type, and form.
Digitization
Convert into electronic form for easy access and dissemination (e.g., TKDL).
Disclosure
Provide as reference to patent examiners to prevent biopiracy.
Access and Benefit Sharing
Ensure communities get benefits from commercial use.
4. Important Case Laws on TK Documentation and Protection
Case 1: Neem Patent Case (European Patent Office, 1995–2000)
Facts
W.R. Grace obtained a patent on neem-based pesticide.
India opposed claiming the knowledge existed in Ayurveda and documented in TKDL.
Legal Issue
Can patent be granted on traditional knowledge already in public domain?
Decision
Patent revoked in 2000 due to prior art:
TK documentation proved the knowledge was already known.
Significance
First major case showing importance of documenting TK for defensive protection against biopiracy.
Case 2: Turmeric Patent Case (US Patent 5,401,504, 1997)
Facts
US company patented anti-inflammatory use of turmeric.
India challenged the patent, referencing Ayurvedic texts and TKDL.
Legal Issue
Does traditional knowledge documented in Indian texts prevent patent grant abroad?
Decision
Patent revoked; turmeric use in wound healing already known in TK.
Documentation via TKDL helped establish prior art.
Significance
Highlighted the value of documenting TK for prior art purposes in international patents.
Case 3: Rosy Periwinkle Case (Vincristine & Vinblastine) – India and US dispute, 1990s
Facts
Drugs derived from Catharanthus roseus (periwinkle) traditionally used in medicine.
Claims filed in the US for patenting plant-derived compounds.
Legal Issue
Can documented TK challenge patent claims?
Decision
TK documentation proved existence of prior knowledge.
Patents revoked or restricted to derivative methods.
Significance
Reinforces documentation as defensive protection for medicinal plants.
Case 4: Himalaya Drug Company v. US Patent Office (Ayurvedic Product Case, 2003)
Facts
Himalaya used Ayurvedic formulations, challenged foreign patent applications on similar formulations.
Legal Issue
Can TKDL documentation prevent patenting of known formulations abroad?
Decision
Patent claims were rejected based on TKDL prior art citations.
Significance
Demonstrates strategic role of TK documentation in patent opposition.
Case 5: Basmati Rice Patent Challenge (RiceTec Inc. vs India, 1997–2002)
Facts
US company RiceTec tried to patent “Basmati rice” lines.
India opposed based on documented TK regarding Basmati cultivation.
Legal Issue
Is documented TK sufficient to defend GI and traditional knowledge?
Decision
Patent partially revoked; US patent narrowed to specific hybrid variety, not Basmati name.
Documentation of traditional cultivation and characteristics was key.
Significance
Shows TK documentation supports both GI protection and defensive patenting.
Case 6: Himalaya Drug Co. v. US Patent Office (2003, Anti-Diabetic Herbal Formulation)
Facts
Patents sought on herbal formulations already documented in Ayurveda.
Legal Issue
Can prior TK documentation prevent patenting of known herbal formulations?
Decision
Patent rejected; prior art included classical texts digitized in TKDL.
Significance
Confirms value of TK documentation in protecting traditional medicinal knowledge.
Case 7: Neem Biopiracy Case (India v. W.R. Grace, European Patent Office)
This case emphasizes international enforcement.
Indian TK documentation provided evidence to oppose patents.
Evolved into model for TK digital libraries worldwide.
5. Key Lessons from Case Laws
Documentation serves as defensive protection against wrongful patenting.
Prior art proof is essential: TKDL or classical texts help demonstrate novelty lack.
Medicinal plants and herbal formulations are frequent targets of biopiracy.
Legal recognition of TK is strengthened by proper documentation.
International relevance: Documented TK can influence patent offices globally.
Community benefit-sharing: Documentation supports biopiracy prevention and fair compensation.
6. Practical Implications
Maintain a structured, searchable TK database.
Use TK documentation as prior art in patent examinations worldwide.
Digitization ensures accessibility for patent examiners and researchers.
TK documentation is critical for GI protection, plant variety protection, and herbal medicine commercialization.
Ensures compliance with TRIPS and CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity).
7. Conclusion
Documentation of Traditional Knowledge is a powerful tool for defending IP rights and preventing misappropriation:
Cases like Turmeric Patent, Neem, Basmati Rice demonstrate the importance of TKDL and classical text digitization.
Proper documentation serves both defensive and strategic purposes, protecting communities and preserving heritage.
Legal recognition of TK through documentation ensures India complies with TRIPS, CBD, and domestic IP laws.
RELATED Blog
comments