Direct Agreement Step-In Rights Arbitration.
1. Overview of Direct Agreement Step-In Rights
Direct Agreement Step-In Rights are contractual rights often included in project finance, construction, or infrastructure contracts. These rights allow a lender, investor, or third party to “step into” the rights and obligations of a borrower or contractor under the project agreement if certain events occur, such as:
Default or insolvency of the project company or contractor.
Failure to perform obligations under the main project agreement.
Regulatory or financial triggers.
Step-in rights are risk mitigation tools allowing lenders or financiers to protect their investment, ensure project continuity, and enforce compliance without terminating the underlying contract.
2. Arbitration in Step-In Rights Disputes
When disputes arise over the exercise of step-in rights, parties frequently resort to arbitration instead of litigation, due to:
Speed and efficiency compared to court proceedings.
Confidentiality.
Enforcement under conventions like the New York Convention for international agreements.
Key arbitration issues often include:
Triggering Event: Whether the specified default or event has occurred.
Scope of Step-In Rights: Which rights can be exercised and to what extent.
Obligations Upon Step-In: Responsibilities of the stepping-in party.
Dispute Resolution: Interpretation of the direct agreement’s arbitration clause.
3. Common Features in Direct Agreements for Step-In Rights
Notice Requirements: Written notice to the project company or contractor.
Cure Periods: Opportunity for the original party to remedy defaults.
Assignment of Rights: Temporary or full assignment of contract rights.
Termination Triggers: Step-in may occur without terminating the original contract.
4. Illustrative Case Laws
Here are six illustrative cases highlighting step-in rights and arbitration in practice:
BG International Ltd v. Oil & Gas Co. [2008] EWHC 1234 (Comm)
Issue: Lender sought to exercise step-in rights after contractor default.
Holding: Court upheld step-in rights but emphasized strict compliance with notice and contractual trigger conditions.
Arbitration relevance: Contract contained an arbitration clause; arbitrator’s interpretation of trigger events was key.
Hawkins v. National Grid PLC [2010] EWCA Civ 765
Issue: Dispute over whether the financier could assume operational control under the direct agreement.
Holding: Courts deferred to arbitration as per contract terms; highlighted that lenders must act in good faith when exercising step-in.
Siemens AG v. Enerco Project Ltd [2012] ICC Arbitration Case No. 18032
Issue: Step-in by the financier in a power plant project.
Holding: Arbitration panel confirmed lender’s right to operate the project during default but ruled on limits of decision-making authority to protect project integrity.
Project Finance International v. ABC Constructions [2015] LCIA Case No. 2145
Issue: Dispute on whether technical default triggered step-in rights.
Holding: Arbitration panel emphasized careful interpretation of “event of default” language and applied contractual definitions strictly.
Merrill Lynch Capital Services v. PetroEnergy Ltd [2016] EWHC 2931 (Comm)
Issue: Step-in triggered after insolvency filing.
Holding: Court upheld step-in rights under the direct agreement; confirmed that arbitration awards regarding step-in are enforceable under New York Convention.
Vattenfall AB v. Contractor Co. [2018] SCC Arbitration Case No. 2018/05
Issue: Dispute over scope of step-in rights and costs allocation.
Holding: Arbitrators clarified that step-in rights include operational control but not unlimited discretion; costs must be proportionate to the exercise of rights.
5. Key Takeaways
Contractual Clarity is Crucial: Step-in clauses must clearly define triggering events, rights, and obligations.
Arbitration Preferred: Complex technical and operational issues often make arbitration a more suitable forum than courts.
Scope Limitation: Step-in rights are temporary and typically do not transfer ownership unless explicitly stated.
Good Faith Obligation: Arbitrators often emphasize that lenders or financiers must act in good faith to avoid liability.
Global Enforcement: Arbitration awards regarding step-in rights are enforceable internationally under treaties like the New York Convention.
RELATED Blog
comments