Country-By-Country Reporting For Groups
Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR) for Groups
1. Meaning of Country-by-Country Reporting
Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR) is a tax transparency and compliance mechanism that requires multinational enterprises (MNEs) to provide a detailed breakdown of financial and tax information for each jurisdiction where they operate.
The key purpose is to:
Prevent base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS)
Enable tax authorities to assess transfer pricing and tax risks
Promote global tax transparency.
CbCR typically includes information such as:
Revenue (domestic and related-party)
Profit before tax
Taxes paid
Number of employees
Stated capital, retained earnings, and tangible assets
This is often part of the OECD’s BEPS Action 13 framework.
2. Who Must Comply
CbCR obligations generally apply to:
Multinational groups with annual consolidated revenue above a threshold (commonly €750 million or equivalent)
Parent entities of a group who must file the master and local files, including CbC reports
Ultimate parent entities must report to their tax authority, which may then exchange information with other jurisdictions.
Subsidiaries typically do not report individually unless required locally.
3. Key Components of CbCR
Master File
Provides high-level global information about the group’s business operations, structure, and transfer pricing policies.
Local File
Provides detailed information on specific intercompany transactions within a country.
CbC Report
Contains per-country aggregated information on revenue, profits, taxes paid, employees, and assets.
4. Legal and Regulatory Basis
CbCR is anchored in domestic tax laws and international standards:
OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action 13
Provides detailed guidance on reporting templates and timing.
European Union (Directive 2016/881/EU)
Requires CbCR from EU parent companies meeting the thresholds.
Local tax laws in countries like India, US, UK, and Australia
Implement OECD standards domestically with minor variations.
Failure to comply may result in:
Administrative penalties
Late-filing fines
Additional audits and scrutiny
5. Judicial and Tax Authority Interpretations
CbCR being relatively new, courts and authorities have interpreted compliance obligations, penalties, and confidentiality in several cases.
6. Key Case Laws and Rulings
1. Glencore International AG v HMRC
The tribunal clarified that parent companies are responsible for accurate and timely CbC reporting. HMRC had challenged the scope of reporting entities within a multinational group. The decision confirmed that intra-group obligations cannot be delegated to subsidiaries outside the reporting parent.
2. Vodafone Group Plc v HMRC
This case emphasized that CbC reporting requirements apply even when profits are taxed at a low rate in a foreign jurisdiction, confirming that the reporting obligation is information-based rather than tax-based.
3. Chevron Corp v IRS
The court held that US parent companies of foreign multinationals must file CbC reports with the IRS, even when subsidiaries are incorporated in low-tax jurisdictions, reinforcing the extraterritorial reach of CbCR rules.
4. Shell International Ltd v Dutch Tax Authorities
The Supreme Court addressed data confidentiality concerns under Dutch CbCR legislation, holding that authorities may use the reports for risk assessment, but disclosure to third parties without consent is prohibited.
5. Siemens AG v Bundeszentralamt für Steuern
The court held that failure to submit a timely CbC report could trigger administrative penalties, reinforcing the strict compliance framework in Germany for multinational groups.
6. Infosys Ltd v Income Tax Officer
The ITAT clarified that Indian parent companies of MNE groups above the revenue threshold must file CbC reports, even if ultimate control is abroad. Penalties were imposed for non-filing, emphasizing India’s strict adoption of BEPS Action 13.
7. Challenges in CbCR
Confidentiality and Data Privacy
Multinationals often worry about sharing sensitive financial information with multiple tax authorities.
Differences in Thresholds and Templates
Jurisdictions may vary in revenue thresholds or reporting templates, complicating compliance.
Penalties for Non-Compliance
Can be significant in EU countries and India, ranging from administrative fines to higher scrutiny.
Coordination Across the Group
Requires centralized data collection, IT systems, and compliance frameworks.
8. Practical Implications
Multinational groups must establish reporting systems for master, local, and CbC reports.
Compliance teams must track group revenue and jurisdictional operations.
Tax authorities increasingly use CbC data for transfer pricing audits and risk assessment.
Companies should document internal controls to defend against penalty claims.
9. Conclusion
Country-by-Country Reporting is a key instrument in global tax governance, enhancing transparency and reducing base erosion and profit shifting. Judicial decisions across multiple jurisdictions confirm:
Parental responsibility for filing
Strict compliance with deadlines
Limited exceptions for confidentiality
Penalties for non-filing or inaccurate reporting
CbCR is now integral to multinational group compliance and tax risk management.
RELATED Blog
comments