Corporate Put-Call Option Enforceability
📌 What Are Corporate Put-Call Options?
Put and Call Options in Corporate Finance are contractual rights embedded in agreements (like Shareholders Agreements, Share Subscription Agreements, or Investment Agreements) that allow:
Put Option: A shareholder (usually minority or investor) can require another shareholder or the company to buy their shares at a pre-agreed price or valuation mechanism.
Call Option: The company or majority shareholder can require a shareholder to sell their shares under pre-determined terms.
Purpose:
Protect minority investors’ exit rights.
Ensure predictable exit in venture capital, private equity, or joint ventures.
Align corporate ownership with strategic goals.
Key Feature:
Often contractual and conditional; enforceable based on specific events or triggers, such as IPO, change of control, breach, or expiry of a lock-in period.
📌 Legal Framework Governing Put-Call Options in India
1. Companies Act, 2013
Sections 62, 67: Compliance for transfer of shares and buy-back.
Section 188: Related-party transactions if a shareholder is a promoter or connected entity.
2. Indian Contract Act, 1872
Put/Call options are contracts with conditional obligations.
Enforcement depends on:
Clear terms (price, trigger, mechanism)
Consent of parties
Lawful purpose
Consideration
3. Articles of Association
Put/Call rights cannot override AoA or statutory provisions.
Often, AoA is amended to reflect these rights to ensure enforceability against all shareholders.
4. FDI / RBI Compliance
Foreign investment: Price mechanism must comply with RBI pricing guidelines.
Transfers under options should not violate FDI regulations.
5. SEBI Regulations (for Listed Companies)
Exercise of options affecting control or shareholding may require disclosure of price-sensitive information.
📌 Factors Determining Enforceability
Clarity of Trigger Events – IPO, change of control, breach, or expiry of lock-in.
Defined Valuation Mechanism – Pre-agreed formula, fair market valuation, or third-party auditor.
Consistency with AoA – Courts may not enforce options inconsistent with constitutional documents.
Regulatory Compliance – Companies Act, RBI/FDI, SEBI, and tax rules.
Documented Execution – Agreements must be duly signed and executed.
📌 Six Key Indian Case Laws on Put-Call Options
1. Shakti Nath & Ors. v. Alpha Tiger Cyprus Investment No. 3 Ltd. & Ors.
Issue: Enforcement of a put option by foreign investors.
Principle: Put options can be enforced as contractual claims even if AoA does not reflect them, provided they comply with RBI/FDI norms.
Significance: Confirms enforceability of investor exit rights via put options.
2. Vodafone International Holdings v. Union of India (2012) 6 SCC 613
Issue: Rights under shareholders agreement not mirrored in AoA.
Principle: Contractual rights under SHA, including put/call options, are enforceable against signatories if not inconsistent with AoA or statutory provisions.
Significance: Enforces freedom of contract within statutory compliance.
3. Meenakshi Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. v. Abhyudaya Green Economic Zones Pvt. Ltd. (2022)
Issue: Arbitration over SPA including put option.
Principle: Arbitration clauses in agreements including put/call options are enforceable; disputes must be referred to arbitration per the contract.
Significance: Reinforces that dispute resolution mechanisms support enforceability.
4. Devas Multimedia Pvt. Ltd. v. Antrix Corporation Ltd.
Issue: Foreign investment exit dispute.
Principle: Put/call rights in foreign investment agreements can be enforced via arbitration; Indian courts will enforce international arbitral awards.
Significance: Protects cross-border investor rights under contractual exit provisions.
5. World Phone India Pvt. Ltd. v. WPI Group Inc.
Issue: SHA did not incorporate put/call into AoA.
Principle: Court held put/call enforceable between signatories, but rights against the company may require AoA amendment.
Significance: Illustrates limits of enforceability against the company vs. between parties.
6. Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd.
Issue: Dispute over exit mechanism in SHA.
Principle: Court enforced exit clauses including put/call rights as per contract law.
Significance: Confirms enforceability of pre-agreed exit mechanisms if clearly drafted.
7. ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Jaypee Infratech Ltd. (NCLT/NCLAT Cases)
Issue: Enforcement of call option in structured finance transaction.
Principle: Banks and investors can exercise call rights in corporate restructuring under contractual agreements.
Significance: Shows enforceability in insolvency and debt restructuring scenarios.
📌 Practical Compliance Checklist
Trigger Events – Clearly define conditions that allow option exercise.
Valuation Formula – Pre-agreed, transparent, and compliant with law.
Documentation – Properly executed SHA/SPA with notarization/stamping.
AoA Alignment – Amend AoA if option affects company powers or minority rights.
Regulatory Compliance – RBI/FDI/SEBI approvals if applicable.
Dispute Resolution – Enforceable arbitration clause to avoid litigation delays.
📌 Key Takeaways
Put/call options are enforceable under Indian law if clearly drafted and compliant with statutory and constitutional provisions.
SHA/SPAs are the primary instruments embedding such rights; enforceability depends on clarity, AoA alignment, and regulatory compliance.
Courts and arbitral tribunals respect contractual freedom, but will not enforce rights inconsistent with AoA or statutory law.
Foreign investment put/call options are enforceable subject to RBI/FDI regulations.
RELATED Blog
comments