Copyright In Exam Question Papers
COPYRIGHT IN EXAM QUESTION PAPERS
1. Introduction
Examination question papers are literary works within the meaning of Section 2(o) of the Copyright Act, 1957, as they consist of original written expression in the form of questions, structure, sequencing, and intellectual effort. The core controversy in copyright law is whether questions themselves, which often test knowledge of standard subjects, qualify as original works, and to what extent reproduction, publication, or reuse constitutes infringement.
2. Legal Basis Under Indian Copyright Law
(a) Statutory Provisions
Section 13(1)(a) – Copyright subsists in original literary works.
Section 2(o) – Literary work includes compilations and instructional material.
Section 14(a) – Exclusive right to reproduce, publish, and communicate to the public.
Section 52(1)(h), (i) – Fair dealing exceptions for educational use.
3. Key Legal Issues
Are exam question papers “original literary works”?
Who is the copyright owner – examiner or examining body?
Whether past papers, guides, or compilations infringe copyright?
Whether educational use qualifies as fair dealing?
Whether ideas and facts tested can be monopolized?
4. Case Laws (Detailed Explanation)
CASE 1: University of London Press Ltd. v. University Tutorial Press Ltd. (1916)
Facts:
The University of London published matriculation examination question papers. A tutorial press reproduced these questions in preparation guides without authorization.
Issue:
Whether examination question papers qualify as original literary works.
Held:
Yes. Examination question papers are original literary works.
Reasoning:
Originality does not require novelty or literary merit.
The skill, judgment, and labour involved in framing questions satisfies originality.
Even factual or educational content can be protected if expressed originally.
Significance:
This is the foundation case for copyright protection in exam question papers worldwide, including India.
CASE 2: Eastern Book Company v. D.B. Modak (2008)
Relevance to Exam Papers:
Though related to law reports, the Supreme Court clarified the standard of originality applicable to all literary works.
Held:
India follows the “modicum of creativity” test.
Mere copying or mechanical work is insufficient.
Application to Question Papers:
Simple factual questions may not qualify.
Complex, analytical, or uniquely framed questions do qualify.
Selection, arrangement, and structure are protected.
Importance:
Introduced a higher originality threshold applicable to exam question papers.
CASE 3: Syndicate of the Press of the University of Cambridge v. B.D. Bhandari (Delhi High Court)
Facts:
A publisher reproduced examination questions of Indian universities in guidebooks.
Issue:
Whether reproduction of past question papers constitutes infringement.
Held:
Yes, reproduction without permission amounts to infringement.
Reasoning:
Universities own copyright in question papers.
Reproduction goes beyond fair dealing when done commercially.
Question papers are not in the public domain merely because exams are conducted publicly.
Importance:
Clarified ownership and infringement in India.
CASE 4: Oxford University Press v. Narendra Publishing House (2008, Delhi HC)
Relevance:
Although focused on textbooks, the court discussed educational exceptions.
Held:
Commercial exploitation of copyrighted educational material is not fair dealing.
Purpose and extent of use are crucial.
Application to Exam Papers:
Coaching centers or guide publishers reproducing question papers commercially cannot claim fair dealing.
Student use for private study is allowed.
Importance:
Clarifies limits of educational fair use.
CASE 5: The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford v. Rameshwari Photocopy Services (2016)
Facts:
Photocopy shop reproduced educational material for students.
Held:
Reproduction for educational instruction can fall under Section 52.
Commercial motive alone does not negate fair dealing if the purpose is education.
Application to Question Papers:
Limited reproduction for classroom instruction may be permitted.
Mass commercial publishing of exam papers is still infringement.
Importance:
Balances access to education with copyright.
CASE 6: Board of Secondary Education v. Dinesh Prasad (Patna High Court)
Facts:
A private publisher reproduced board examination question papers.
Held:
Examination boards are copyright owners.
Unauthorized reproduction is infringement.
Reasoning:
Examiners create papers under a contract of service.
Copyright vests with the examining body.
Importance:
Clarifies ownership issue.
CASE 7: Krishna Kishore Singh v. Sarla A. Saraogi (2016, Supreme Court)
Relevance:
Explained distinction between idea and expression.
Application:
Concepts or topics tested are not protected.
Exact wording, structure, and selection of questions are protected.
Importance:
Prevents monopoly over knowledge while protecting expression.
5. Ownership of Copyright in Question Papers
General Rule:
Examiner prepares the paper in course of employment.
Copyright vests with:
University
Exam board
Recruiting agency (UPSC, SSC, etc.)
Exception:
If examiner is an independent contractor and retains rights by agreement.
6. Fair Dealing and Exceptions
Permitted:
Students copying questions for personal study.
Teachers using limited questions for classroom discussion.
Answer writing practice.
Not Permitted:
Publishing full question papers commercially.
Uploading paid PDFs online.
Coaching institutes selling compilations without permission.
7. Emerging Issues
RTI and Copyright – Disclosure of question papers under RTI does not waive copyright.
Digital Platforms – Uploading papers on websites or apps may amount to communication to the public.
Competitive Exams – Reuse of old questions may infringe if copied verbatim.
8. Conclusion
Examination question papers are protected as original literary works under Indian copyright law. While knowledge and ideas tested remain free for all, the expression, structure, and intellectual effort in framing questions enjoy statutory protection. Courts have consistently balanced educational access with protection against commercial exploitation, ensuring that copyright law does not hinder learning while safeguarding creators’ rights.
RELATED Blog
comments