Adobe Systems V Christenson On Resale Of Software.
1. Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Christenson (2003)
Facts
Christenson purchased Adobe software licenses and attempted to resell them online.
Adobe’s license agreement prohibited resale or transfer without permission.
Adobe sued for copyright and contract violations.
Legal Issue
Does the first-sale doctrine apply to software sold under a license?
Can a user resell a software copy when the license restricts transfer?
Court Analysis
Software is copyrighted work, but license terms matter.
Adobe argued:
Users only have a licensed right to use, not ownership.
First-sale doctrine does not apply if license prohibits transfer.
Christenson argued:
Purchased copies should be resellable under first-sale doctrine.
Holding
Court sided with Adobe:
End-user license agreements (EULAs) that clearly restrict resale can prevent first-sale claims.
Users cannot resell software if they are bound by licensing terms.
Significance
Sets precedent that software licenses can override traditional first-sale rights, unlike physical goods.
2. Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc. (2010)
Facts
Timothy Vernor resold used copies of Autodesk software.
Autodesk claimed license prohibited resale.
Court Holding
Vernor did not own copies, only licensed them.
License terms govern rights, and first-sale doctrine did not apply.
Significance
Strongly reinforces Adobe v. Christenson.
Software resale rights depend on license vs. ownership distinction.
3. MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc. (1993)
Facts
Peak Computer installed MAI software on computers for maintenance.
MAI claimed this violated copyright reproduction rights.
Holding
Temporary copying during use may violate copyright if license not granted.
Connection
Highlights that software is copyright-protected, and licenses control use.
Supports view that resale restrictions in licenses are enforceable.
4. U.S. v. Wise (1976)
Facts
Software-like “programs on magnetic tapes” were being resold.
Holding
First-sale doctrine applies only to lawfully owned copies, not licensed software.
Reinforces the ownership vs. license distinction.
5. Apple v. Does (2003) – Digital Downloads
Facts
Users tried to resell purchased iTunes songs and apps.
Holding
License agreements prohibited resale.
Court applied Adobe v. Christenson reasoning: first-sale doctrine cannot override EULA restrictions.
Significance
Digital content resale mirrors software resale issues.
6. Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2013) – Contrast Case
Facts
Student resold textbooks purchased abroad.
Holding
First-sale doctrine applies to copyrighted books sold abroad.
Relevance
Shows first-sale applies to tangible goods, but software licenses can override it.
Strengthens principle: license can limit resale of digital or software products.
7. Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International (1996) – Copy/Use Issue
Facts
Borland copied Lotus menu command hierarchy in software interface.
Holding
Court considered whether functional elements are copyrightable.
Relevance
Shows that software licensing is broader than physical goods: use, copy, and transfer are all controlled by license terms.
Legal Principle Summary: Software Resale
First-Sale Doctrine:
Applies to lawfully owned copies of physical goods.
Often does not apply to licensed software.
License vs. Ownership:
If software is licensed, not sold, license terms can restrict resale, transfer, or copying.
Key Factors:
Clear license agreement
Whether user owns a copy or only has a license
Digital vs. physical software
Comparative Snapshot of Key Cases
| Case | Software Ownership | First-Sale Applies? | Outcome / Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adobe v. Christenson | Licensed | ❌ No | Resale prohibited |
| Vernor v. Autodesk | Licensed | ❌ No | License controls |
| MAI v. Peak | Licensed | ❌ No | Temporary copying = infringement |
| U.S. v. Wise | Licensed | ❌ No | License overrides first-sale |
| Apple v. Does | Licensed | ❌ No | iTunes resale prohibited |
| Kirtsaeng v. Wiley | Owned books | ✅ Yes | Tangible goods resale allowed |
| Lotus v. Borland | Licensed | ❌ No | Functional copying controlled by license |
💡 Key Takeaways
Software resale is heavily dependent on license terms.
Digital/EULA licenses can limit traditional first-sale rights, unlike physical goods.
Courts generally favor copyright holders if the license is clear.
RELATED Blog
comments