Ad-Interim Stay In Corporate Cases
1. Meaning of Ad-Interim Stay in Corporate Law
An ad-interim stay is a temporary, urgent protective order granted without or before detailed hearing of the opposite party, to:
Preserve the status quo
Prevent irreversible corporate harm
Ensure that final relief, if granted, is not rendered illusory
It operates till the next date of hearing or until modified/vacated.
2. Statutory Basis for Ad-Interim Stay
A. Companies Act, 2013
Section 242(4) – Interim orders in oppression and mismanagement cases
Section 420(2) – Power to rectify mistakes
Section 221 – Freezing of assets in cases of fraud
B. NCLT Rules, 2016
Rule 11 – Inherent powers of Tribunal
Rule 32 & 37 – Interim directions and service
C. Inherent & Equitable Jurisdiction
NCLT exercises powers analogous to Order XXXIX CPC, though not strictly bound by CPC.
3. Situations Where Ad-Interim Stay Is Commonly Granted
Stay on board/shareholder resolutions
Stay on removal or appointment of directors
Restraint on share allotment or dilution
Freeze on asset alienation
Stay on invocation of corporate guarantees
Suspension of related-party transactions
Maintenance of status quo in management
4. Legal Tests for Grant of Ad-Interim Stay
Tribunals consistently apply the triple-test, even at ad-interim stage:
Prima Facie Case
Arguable case, not proof
Balance of Convenience
Greater hardship if stay is refused
Irreparable Injury
Harm not compensable in money
Additionally, courts consider:
Urgency
Conduct of applicant
Risk of fait accompli
5. Nature and Duration of Ad-Interim Stay
Usually ex parte
Time-bound and subject to confirmation
Opposite party must be heard at the earliest
Can be vacated, modified, or confirmed
⚠️ Prolonged ad-interim stays without hearing are discouraged.
6. Limits on Grant of Ad-Interim Stay
Ad-interim stay will not be granted if:
Petitioner suppresses material facts
Relief sought amounts to final relief
No urgency or irreversibility is shown
Corporate actions are already completed
Public interest or third-party rights are affected
7. Leading Case Laws on Ad-Interim Stay in Corporate Cases
1. Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund v. Kartick Das
Supreme Court of India
Principle:
Ex parte ad-interim injunctions must be granted sparingly
Court must record reasons and ensure urgency
Relevance:
Governing authority on ad-interim reliefs
2. V.S. Krishnan v. Westfort Hi-Tech Hospital Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Principle:
NCLT has wide powers to grant interim and ad-interim relief
Objective is to prevent oppression from becoming irreversible
Application:
Frequently cited in Section 241–242 cases
3. Shanti Prasad Jain v. Kalinga Tubes Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Principle:
Interim relief justified to prevent acts lacking probity
Tribunal must protect minority interests at early stage
Importance:
Oppression jurisprudence foundation
4. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. Tata Sons Ltd.
NCLAT
Principle:
Status quo orders justified to prevent fait accompli
Corporate governance disputes merit interim protection
Significance:
Modern application in large corporate disputes
5. Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Ltd. v. Union of India
Supreme Court of India
Principle:
Interim orders should not disrupt legitimate commercial functioning
Balance of convenience is crucial
Relevance:
Limits over-broad ad-interim stays
6. Dale & Carrington Investment (P) Ltd. v. P.K. Prathapan
Supreme Court of India
Principle:
Abuse of fiduciary power justifies immediate injunctive relief
Courts must prevent dilution of minority rights at inception
Application:
Used for ad-interim stay on share allotments
7. Canara Bank v. Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd.
NCLAT
Principle:
Interim stay should preserve assets and management
Tribunal may intervene early to protect stakeholders
8. Binani Industries Ltd. v. Bank of Baroda
NCLAT
Principle:
Interim relief necessary to preserve value and fairness
Procedural technicalities should not defeat justice
8. Procedure for Seeking Ad-Interim Stay
File application with urgency affidavit
Disclose all material facts
Demonstrate imminent harm
Seek narrowly-tailored relief
Serve opposite party immediately after order
Prepare for early confirmation hearing
9. Consequences of Ad-Interim Stay
Corporate actions in violation are voidable
Contempt proceedings may follow
Tribunal may impose costs for misuse
Stay may influence final outcome if equities crystallise
10. Key Principles Emerging from Jurisprudence
Ad-interim stay is exceptional, not routine
Urgency and irreversibility are decisive
Reasons must be recorded
Status quo is preferred over intrusive orders
Equity guides discretion
Early hearing is mandatory
11. Conclusion
Ad-interim stay in corporate cases is a powerful but delicate judicial tool, designed to:
Prevent abuse of corporate power
Protect minority and stakeholder interests
Preserve the substratum of disputes
NCLT and appellate courts consistently emphasise that speed must not override fairness, and temporary protection must not become permanent adjudication.
RELATED Blog
comments