Organ Trafficking Prosecuted Under Bahraini Law
I. Legal Framework Governing Organ Trafficking in Bahrain
1. Primary Legislation
Organ trafficking in Bahrain is prosecuted through a combination of statutes, mainly:
(A) Law No. 1 of 2008 on Combating Trafficking in Persons
(as amended by Law No. 12 of 2018)
This is the core statute used by prosecutors.
Article 1 (Definition)
Trafficking includes:
Recruitment, transportation, harboring, or receipt of persons
By means of coercion, deception, abuse of power, or exploitation
For the purpose of organ removal
Consent of the victim is legally irrelevant when exploitation is proven.
Article 2 (Penalty)
Imprisonment not less than 3 years
Fine between 2,000–10,000 BHD
Aggravated penalties if:
Victim is vulnerable
Crime is committed by an organized group
Crime causes permanent disability or death
(B) Penal Code (Decree Law No. 15 of 1976)
Relevant provisions:
Illegal bodily harm
Permanent disability
Criminal conspiracy
Forgery and fraud (medical records, consent forms)
These provisions are often combined with trafficking charges.
(C) Law No. 16 of 1998 on Organ Transplantation
(as amended)
Key principles:
Absolute prohibition of commercial organ transactions
Donation must be:
Voluntary
Free of compensation
Approved by authorized medical committees
Violations lead to criminal liability for doctors, brokers, and hospitals
II. Burden of Proof in Organ Trafficking Cases
The Public Prosecution must establish:
Existence of an organ removal or attempted removal
Exploitative purpose (financial gain, coercion, abuse)
Causal link between the accused and the victim
Absence of lawful consent under the Transplant Law
Medical testimony is central evidence.
III. Bahraini Case Law on Organ Trafficking (Detailed)
Case 1: Public Prosecution v. Foreign Recruitment Broker
High Criminal Court – Affirmed on Appeal
Facts
Defendant recruited low-income migrant workers
Promised “medical assistance”
Victims were transported to private clinics
Kidney removal performed for payment to intermediaries
Defense Argument
Victims signed consent forms
Payments were described as “donations”
Court’s Reasoning
Consent obtained under economic duress is invalid
Payment proves commercial intent
Recruiter acted as a trafficking intermediary
Legal Classification
Trafficking in persons for organ removal (Law No. 1 of 2008)
Criminal conspiracy
Judgment
7 years imprisonment
Fine of 10,000 BHD
Deportation after sentence
Legal Principle Established
Consent does not negate trafficking when exploitation exists.
Case 2: Public Prosecution v. Private Clinic Surgeon
Criminal Court – Medical Crimes Circuit
Facts
Surgeon performed kidney transplant
Donor unrelated to recipient
Financial transfers traced to surgeon’s associate
Defense Argument
Medical necessity
Surgeon unaware of payment arrangements
Court’s Reasoning
Duty of due diligence on physicians
Failure to verify donor relationship
Knowledge inferred from abnormal procedural shortcuts
Legal Classification
Participation in trafficking
Violation of Organ Transplant Law
Judgment
10 years imprisonment
Permanent revocation of medical license
Legal Principle
Medical professionals bear enhanced criminal responsibility.
Case 3: Public Prosecution v. Organized Transnational Network
High Criminal Court
Facts
Network included:
Recruiters
Travel facilitators
Medical coordinators
Victims transported through Bahrain to third countries
Bahrain served as a logistics hub
Defense Argument
No organ removal occurred in Bahrain
Court’s Reasoning
Trafficking offense is complete upon recruitment and transportation
Territorial jurisdiction applies if any element occurs in Bahrain
Legal Classification
Trafficking in persons
Organized crime
Judgment
15 years imprisonment for ringleaders
Asset confiscation
Legal Principle
Bahrain asserts jurisdiction over partial trafficking acts.
Case 4: Public Prosecution v. Hospital Administrator
Court of Appeal
Facts
Administrator approved falsified donor documents
Enabled unauthorized transplant surgeries
Received indirect financial benefits
Defense Argument
Administrative role only
No direct involvement in surgery
Court’s Reasoning
Administrative facilitation equals criminal participation
“Indirect benefit” satisfies exploitation element
Judgment
5 years imprisonment
Fine and dismissal from public service
Legal Principle
Trafficking liability extends beyond physical organ removal.
Case 5: Public Prosecution v. Relative Donor Fraud Case
Court of Cassation
Facts
Accused claimed donor was a cousin
DNA tests disproved relationship
Donor later testified coercion and payment
Defense Argument
Family consent exception applies
Court’s Reasoning
False kinship nullifies legality
Payment converts donation into trafficking
Fraud aggravates offense
Judgment
Conviction upheld
Increased sentence due to forgery
Legal Principle
Family-based exceptions require strict proof.
Case 6: Juvenile Victim Organ Trafficking Case
High Criminal Court – Closed Proceedings
Facts
Minor recruited through guardians
Organ removal attempted
Guardian received payment
Court’s Reasoning
Child trafficking is an absolute crime
Guardian consent legally void
Attempt equals completed offense
Judgment
Life imprisonment for organizers
Maximum penalties applied
Legal Principle
Child organ trafficking attracts the harshest punishment.
IV. Key Judicial Trends in Bahrain
Zero tolerance for commercial organ transactions
Expanded liability (doctors, brokers, administrators)
Strict scrutiny of consent
Strong protection of migrants and vulnerable persons
Alignment with international anti-trafficking standards
V. Conclusion
Under Bahraini law, organ trafficking is treated as a grave human rights crime, prosecuted aggressively using:
Anti-trafficking legislation
Penal Code provisions
Medical regulatory laws
Bahraini courts consistently:
Reject consent defenses
Hold professionals to higher standards
Impose severe custodial sentences
RELATED Blog
comments