SC Disqualifies Candidate Over Misleading Affidavit: Truth Must Be on the Ballot

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court disqualified a recently elected MLA for submitting a misleading election affidavit regarding criminal cases and asset disclosures.

The judgment drives home a clear message: you can’t lie to voters and still expect to lead them.

The Case

A political candidate failed to mention a pending FIR and a loan default in his affidavit during the 2022 elections. His rival filed a petition after results were declared.

What the Court Said

• Suppression of material facts violates the voter’s right to informed choice

False affidavits = breach of constitutional ethics under Article 19(1)(a) (freedom of speech)

• Disqualification is necessary to maintain purity of the electoral process

Implications

• A chilling effect on political candidates who fudge details

• Strengthens voters' Right to Know

• Reinforces Section 125A of the Representation of People Act

This is electoral integrity, backed by constitutional firepower.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments