Legal Analysis: Pathalgarhi Movement
Legal Analysis: Pathalgadi Movement
1. Background of the Pathalgadi Movement
The Pathalgadi Movement emerged primarily among tribal communities in Jharkhand, India, around 2017.
The movement involves erecting stone slabs (called pathalgadi) inscribed with constitutional provisions and asserting tribal self-rule and rights over their land and resources.
It is a form of tribal assertion against perceived encroachment and dilution of their constitutional and legal rights, particularly related to land alienation, governance, and resource control.
2. Legal Context
(a) Constitutional Provisions
Fifth Schedule and Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution:
These schedules protect the rights of Scheduled Tribes (STs) over their land and governance structures.
Article 244 and 244A:
Provide autonomy and special governance arrangements for tribal areas.
Article 19(1)(c):
Right to reside and settle in any part of India, but special protections restrict alienation of tribal land.
(b) The Forest Rights Act, 2006 (FRA)
Recognizes the rights of forest-dwelling tribal communities over land and resources.
Empowers tribes to manage and protect their traditional territories.
(c) Chotanagpur Tenancy Act (CNT) and Santhal Pargana Tenancy Act (SPT)
These acts restrict transfer and alienation of tribal land to non-tribals.
Protect the rights of tribal communities over their ancestral land.
3. Issues Raised by the Movement
(a) Assertion of Tribal Autonomy
Tribal communities invoke constitutional and legal rights to govern their villages without external interference.
The inscriptions on stone slabs emphasize tribal sovereignty and the application of customary law.
(b) Land Rights and Protection Against Alienation
Tribes protest against government attempts to amend tenancy laws perceived to enable easier acquisition of tribal land for industrial projects.
The movement highlights tribal resistance to displacement and loss of livelihood.
(c) Conflict with State Authorities
The government viewed the movement as a challenge to the rule of law and public order.
Several activists and participants were arrested under charges including sedition, unlawful assembly, and obstruction of government officials.
4. Legal Challenges and Controversies
State vs. Tribal Autonomy:
The tension between tribal self-governance and state sovereignty is central. While the Constitution recognizes tribal autonomy, it also mandates state laws and administration.
Freedom of Expression and Assembly:
Questions arise on the legality of expressing dissent and asserting rights versus maintaining public order.
Criminal Proceedings:
Arrests and prosecutions of activists have drawn criticism from human rights groups, alleging misuse of laws to suppress legitimate protest.
5. Judicial Responses and Human Rights Concerns
Courts have often reiterated the protection of tribal rights under the Constitution and statutory laws.
Some interventions emphasized the need to balance tribal rights with public order and development.
Human rights organizations have raised concerns about excessive state action, arbitrary arrests, and violations of fundamental rights.
6. Conclusion
The Pathalgadi Movement is a complex legal and socio-political assertion of tribal identity and rights, rooted in constitutional guarantees. It raises critical questions about:
The scope of tribal autonomy under Indian law.
The protection of land and resource rights of indigenous communities.
The limits of state authority in tribal areas.
The balance between development, governance, and human rights.
RELATED Blog
0 comments