Interpretation of Statutes at Hungary

Here’s an overview of Interpretation of Statutes in Hungary, a civil law country in Central Europe:

⚖️ Interpretation of Statutes in Hungary

Hungary’s legal system is based on the civil law tradition influenced by continental European law, especially the German and Austrian legal systems. Interpretation of statutes focuses on the text, purpose, and context of the legislation.

🔹 Legal Framework

The Fundamental Law of Hungary (2011) is the supreme legal document.

Statutes are enacted by the National Assembly.

Courts interpret laws within the framework of the Constitution and international treaties, including European Union law.

The Constitutional Court reviews laws for constitutional compliance and influences interpretation through its rulings.

🔹 Principles of Statutory Interpretation

Literal (Textual) Interpretation

The starting point is the ordinary meaning of the statutory text.

Words are interpreted in their plain sense unless this leads to unreasonable results.

Systematic Interpretation

Laws are interpreted in context with other statutes and the overall legal system to ensure coherence.

Teleological (Purpose-Oriented) Interpretation

The purpose and objectives of the statute are considered to resolve ambiguities or gaps.

Historical Interpretation

Parliamentary preparatory works may be referenced to clarify legislative intent.

Constitutional and EU Law Compliance

Statutes must be interpreted in conformity with the Fundamental Law and EU law.

The Constitutional Court’s decisions guide interpretation.

🔹 Judicial Role

The Curia of Hungary is the highest court and plays a key role in interpreting statutes.

Lower courts follow binding precedent from the Curia.

Courts do not create law but use interpretation to apply statutes effectively.

Summary:

In Hungary, statutory interpretation combines literal, systematic, and purposive approaches, grounded in the civil law tradition. Interpretation is closely aligned with constitutional principles and EU law requirements, with the Constitutional Court and Curia playing crucial roles in guiding the process.

 

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments