Biotechnology Law at Kiribati
Kiribati's approach to biotechnology regulation is evolving, with a focus on biosafety and environmental protection. Here's an overview of the current legal and institutional framework:
🇰🇮 Kiribati's Biotechnology Legal Framework
1. Biosecurity Act (2011)
The Biosecurity Act is the primary legislation governing the control of pests and diseases affecting animals, plants, and their products. It aims to prevent the entry, establishment, and spread of harmful organisms into Kiribati. While it addresses general biosecurity concerns, it does not specifically cover the deliberate release or use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs)
2. National Biosafety Framework (2007)
In line with its obligations under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, Kiribati developed a National Biosafety Framework. This framework outlines the country's approach to assessing and managing risks associated with GMOs, including:
Establishing a regulatory system for GMO activities.
Implementing risk assessment and management procedures.
Ensuring public awareness and participation in decision-making processes .
3. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Kiribati ratified the Cartagena Protocol in 2004, committing to the safe handling, transport, and use of living modified organisms (LMOs). The protocol emphasizes the precautionary approach and requires parties to assess and manage risks associated with LMOs .
4. Environment Act No. 18 (2021)
The Environment Act provides regulations on access to genetic resources, including facilitating or limiting access and sharing benefits derived from biological resources. It aims to ensure the sustainable use of biodiversity and the equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of genetic resources .
🏛️ Institutional Oversight
The Ministry of Environment, Lands and Agricultural Development (MELAD) is the primary government body responsible for implementing and enforcing biosafety regulations. However, there is limited public evidence of an established agency dedicated solely to biosafety enforcement in Kiribati .
⚠️ Challenges and Considerations
Limited Enforcement Capacity: There is no public evidence of an established agency responsible for the enforcement of biosafety legislation and regulations in Kiribati .
Public Awareness: Efforts are needed to enhance public understanding of biotechnology and biosafety issues.
International Collaboration: Continued participation in international agreements and collaboration with regional partners is essential for strengthening biosafety measures.
RELATED Blog
0 comments