Bars to Matrimonial Relief
Bars to Matrimonial Relief
Meaning:
Matrimonial reliefs are remedies provided by law to parties seeking dissolution or annulment of marriage, or other reliefs like restitution of conjugal rights, maintenance, etc.
Bars to matrimonial relief refer to legal grounds or conditions that prevent a person from obtaining these reliefs. In other words, these are circumstances under which courts refuse to grant matrimonial reliefs.
Types of Bars to Matrimonial Relief:
Statutory Bars:
Bars that arise directly from the provisions of law/statutes.
Equitable Bars:
Bars based on principles of equity and fairness, often related to conduct of parties.
Procedural Bars:
Bars arising due to non-compliance with procedural requirements.
Common Bars to Matrimonial Relief:
| Bar | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Collusion | When both parties agree to obtain relief by deceiving the court. Courts refuse relief if there is collusion. |
| Connivance | When the petitioner is involved in or consented to the matrimonial offense (e.g., adultery). Relief is barred. |
| Condonation | Forgiveness of matrimonial offense by the innocent party. If the aggrieved party condones the offense, relief may be refused. |
| Delay / Laches | Unreasonable delay in seeking relief can bar the claim. Courts expect parties to act promptly. |
| Matrimonial Offense not proved | Failure to prove the grounds (e.g., cruelty, adultery) bars relief. |
| Statutory Time Limit (Limitation) | Filing a petition after expiry of limitation period bars relief. |
| Previous Order or Decree | If there is a final decree on the same cause of action, subsequent relief may be barred (principle of res judicata). |
| Failure to comply with mandatory requirements | Non-compliance with mandatory procedural conditions (e.g., mediation, notice) can bar relief. |
Detailed Explanation of Major Bars:
Collusion:
Both spouses secretly agree to fake or stage grounds for divorce (e.g., adultery).
Courts reject such claims as they abuse the process of law.
Connivance:
If the petitioner secretly allows or encourages the matrimonial offense.
For example, if a husband knowingly allows wife’s adultery and later seeks divorce on that ground, relief may be barred.
Condonation:
Forgiving the offense after knowledge of it, either explicitly or by resuming marital relations.
Once condoned, the petitioner cannot later claim divorce on the same ground.
Delay / Laches:
If a petitioner delays unreasonably in seeking relief after knowledge of the cause, courts may refuse relief.
Limitation:
Each matrimonial relief has a limitation period under Limitation Act, 1963 or special laws.
If petition is filed after limitation, it can be barred.
Failure to prove grounds:
Grounds like cruelty, desertion, or adultery must be established by evidence.
Failure to prove leads to rejection.
Case Laws Illustrating Bars to Matrimonial Relief:
Collusion: Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India – The court rejected relief where collusion was evident.
Condonation: B.K. Sinha v. Union of India – Emphasized that condonation bars divorce on the same ground.
Delay: Daya Kaur v. Surjit Singh – Held that unreasonable delay can lead to dismissal of petition.
Connivance: Ramesh Chandra v. M.P. Sharma – Court refused relief when petitioner connived with matrimonial offense.
Conclusion:
Bars to matrimonial relief ensure that the judicial system is not misused or abused. They uphold fairness by preventing relief where parties act in bad faith, delay unnecessarily, or forgive offenses but later seek relief. Understanding these bars is crucial in matrimonial disputes to know the limitations of legal remedies.
RELATED Blog
0 comments