Wrongful Death By Police Prosecutions
Wrongful Death by Police: Overview
Wrongful death by police typically involves situations where a person dies as a result of actions taken by law enforcement officers, often during arrests, use of force, or other encounters. Prosecutions for such deaths involve criminal liability of police officers, which is often complex due to legal protections like qualified immunity, and the high standard required to prove criminal wrongdoing (like manslaughter or murder).
Key Legal Issues in Wrongful Death by Police:
Use of Force: Was the force used by the officer reasonable under the circumstances?
Excessive Force: Did the officer use more force than necessary, violating constitutional rights?
Criminal Intent: Did the officer act with criminal negligence, recklessness, or malice?
Qualified Immunity: Protects officers from liability unless they violate clearly established law.
Prosecutorial Challenges: Prosecuting police officers often requires overcoming institutional biases, proving intent, and public scrutiny.
Detailed Case Law on Wrongful Death by Police Prosecutions
1. Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989)
Issue: How to evaluate claims of excessive force leading to injury or death.
Facts: Connor was detained by police and subjected to force during a diabetic episode, leading to claims of excessive force.
Holding: The Supreme Court ruled that all claims of excessive force by police are to be judged by an “objective reasonableness” standard under the Fourth Amendment, from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene.
Importance:
Set the key constitutional standard for use-of-force claims.
Does not require perfect hindsight, but reasonable judgment given the circumstances.
Influences wrongful death claims by framing when force crosses into illegality.
2. Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985)
Issue: Is it constitutional for police to use deadly force to prevent a fleeing suspect’s escape?
Facts: Police shot and killed an unarmed fleeing suspect.
Holding: The Court held that deadly force may not be used unless the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.
Importance:
Placed limits on the use of deadly force.
Critical in prosecuting police killings of fleeing suspects without clear threat.
Officers must balance public safety and suspect’s rights.
3. United States v. MacDonald, 916 F.2d 766 (D.C. Cir. 1990)
Issue: Federal criminal prosecution of officers for excessive force causing death.
Facts: Officers used excessive force during an arrest resulting in death.
Holding: The court emphasized the need to prove willfulness or reckless disregard for constitutional rights to convict officers criminally.
Importance:
Established the high bar for criminal liability against police officers in wrongful death cases.
Mere negligence is not enough; prosecution must prove intent or reckless disregard.
4. People v. Rizzo, 162 A.D.3d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Issue: Criminal prosecution of police officers for manslaughter after a wrongful death during a high-speed chase.
Facts: Police officers involved in a chase that resulted in a fatal crash were charged with manslaughter.
Holding: The court upheld the charges, finding sufficient evidence that officers acted recklessly and created a foreseeable risk of death.
Importance:
Shows police can be criminally prosecuted for wrongful deaths caused by reckless conduct during pursuit.
Highlights public safety concerns and legal accountability.
5. Commonwealth v. Kneebone, 999 N.E.2d 11 (Mass. 2013)
Issue: Officer criminally charged with involuntary manslaughter for use of excessive force.
Facts: An officer used a chokehold during arrest causing death.
Holding: The court found sufficient evidence that the officer’s actions were reckless and criminally negligent, justifying manslaughter charges.
Importance:
Demonstrates how courts scrutinize excessive force claims resulting in death.
Reaffirms criminal liability if force is disproportionate and causes death.
6. State v. Worrell, 129 Wn.2d 733 (Wash. 1996)
Issue: Use of force by police resulting in death and applicability of deadly force standards.
Facts: Officer shot a suspect who did not comply with commands.
Holding: The court emphasized officers must have reasonable belief of imminent threat before using deadly force.
Importance:
Reinforced reasonableness and immediacy standards in use of deadly force.
Supports wrongful death prosecution where officers exceed these standards.
7. People v. Goetz, 68 N.Y.2d 96 (1986)
Issue: Justification defense in police shootings.
Facts: Though a civilian case, it’s instructive about the use of deadly force and reasonableness.
Holding: Use of deadly force justified only if a reasonable person would believe they were in imminent danger.
Importance:
Guides wrongful death claims in policing by clarifying what qualifies as justified force.
Summary of Legal Principles in Wrongful Death by Police Prosecutions:
| Principle | Explanation | Key Case(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Reasonableness | Use of force judged by what a reasonable officer would do under circumstances | Graham v. Connor |
| Limits on Deadly Force | Deadly force allowed only if serious threat is imminent | Tennessee v. Garner |
| Criminal Liability Standard | Officers liable only for willful/reckless misconduct, not negligence | MacDonald |
| Accountability in High-Speed Pursuit | Reckless police conduct can lead to manslaughter charges | People v. Rizzo |
| Excessive Force as Criminal Negligence | Disproportionate force can lead to manslaughter charges | Commonwealth v. Kneebone |
| Imminent Threat Requirement | Deadly force justified only with reasonable belief of threat | State v. Worrell |
Additional Notes:
Qualified immunity often protects officers from civil liability, but it does not bar criminal prosecution.
Prosecutors must navigate complex factual scenarios and community pressure.
Public awareness and video evidence have increased scrutiny of police wrongful deaths, influencing prosecutions.
RELATED Blog
0 comments