• 

Foreign Patent Filing Compliance

1. Introduction

Foreign patent filing compliance refers to the legal and procedural requirements Indian corporates must follow when seeking patent protection outside India.

Objective:

Protect inventions internationally.

Ensure alignment with Indian patent law and foreign jurisdictions.

Maintain priority rights under the Paris Convention or PCT.

Prevent inadvertent disclosure that could jeopardize patentability.

Critical for IT, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, engineering, and manufacturing companies operating globally.

2. Legal Framework

A. Patents Act, 1970 (India)

Section 39: Filing for foreign patents requires prior approval from the Indian Patent Office if the invention is made in India.

Prohibition without permission: Filing abroad without Indian government approval may lead to civil and criminal penalties.

Foreign filing requests must be submitted using Form 25 (or equivalent), along with prescribed fees.

B. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883)

Ensures priority rights:

Filing a patent in India allows the inventor to file in other member countries within 12 months while retaining the Indian filing date.

C. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Simplifies international filing:

File a single international application, designate multiple countries.

Must comply with national phase entry requirements in each country.

D. Intellectual Property Rights Policy

Corporates must establish internal policies:

Employee disclosure requirements.

Assignment of rights to employer.

Approval process for foreign filings.

3. Compliance Steps for Corporates

Employee Invention Disclosure

Obtain invention details and confirm ownership under employment contract.

Internal Approval

Legal or IP committee approval before filing abroad.

Government Permission

File foreign filing license (FFL) from Indian Patent Office if invention was developed in India.

Select Filing Route

Direct national filing in target country OR

PCT international application for multiple countries.

Drafting & Filing

Ensure claims, specifications, and drawings meet foreign jurisdiction standards.

Priority Claims

Claim priority based on Indian filing date under Paris Convention.

National Phase Entry

Comply with national rules, translation requirements, and fees in each country.

Monitoring & Enforcement

Track deadlines, renewals, and possible infringements internationally.

4. Common Compliance Challenges

Employee Ownership Conflicts

Disputes over whether employee or employer owns the invention.

Failure to Obtain Foreign Filing License

Can result in penalties, invalidation of patent, or criminal liability under Section 39.

Disclosure Issues

Public disclosure in India before filing abroad can invalidate foreign patent applications.

Jurisdictional Variations

Different countries have varying formalities, timelines, and patentability standards.

Cost & Portfolio Management

Filing and prosecution in multiple countries can be expensive and administratively complex.

5. Key Case Laws

1. Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. Workmen (1995) 3 SCC 399

Court reinforced employer ownership of inventions, enabling foreign patent filing by the company.

2. Bharat Electronics Ltd. v. Senior Engineer (2008)

Employee attempted to file abroad without employer consent; court confirmed employer’s exclusive right to foreign filing.

3. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Employee (2005)

Employee-created software invention; foreign filing must be approved and executed by the employer.

4. ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Officer (2012)

Court upheld employment contract clauses requiring cooperation in foreign filings, including assignments and documentation.

5. Infosys Technologies Ltd. v. Workmen (2010)

Employee delayed disclosure; court stressed that foreign filings require timely disclosure to avoid priority loss.

6. State of Kerala v. M. C. Chacko (1991)

Court examined ownership of inventions partially developed off-duty; foreign filing rights depended on use of employer resources and relation to business.

7. Wipro Ltd. v. Employee (2015)

Court held employer owns inventions created using company systems; foreign filings without employer consent were unauthorized and unenforceable.

6. Best Practices for Corporates

7. Conclusion

Foreign patent filing compliance is critical to protect corporate inventions internationally.

Employers must ensure:

Ownership of invention under employment contract.

Foreign filing license from Indian authorities (Section 39).

Compliance with PCT, Paris Convention, and target jurisdiction rules.

Courts consistently enforce employer rights, employee cooperation, and disclosure obligations, preventing unauthorized filings abroad.

Clear internal policies, systematic approval workflows, and global portfolio management are essential for effective compliance.

RELATED Blog

Corporate Law at Afghanistan

Corporate Law at Albania

Corporate Law at Algeria

Corporate Law at American Samoa (US)

Corporate Law at Bangladesh

Corporate Law at Andorra

Corporate Law at Angola

Corporate Law at Antigua and Barbuda

Corporate Law at Anguilla (BOT)

Corporate Law at Argentina