Enforcement Of Arbitration Agreements By Bahraini Courts
1. Legal Framework in Bahrain
(a) Bahrain Arbitration Law
- Legislative Decree No. 9 of 2015
- Based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
(b) International Framework
- Bahrain is a signatory to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
2. Core Principle: Mandatory Enforcement
Under Bahraini law:
Courts must refer parties to arbitration when a valid arbitration agreement exists.
Key Rule:
- If a party brings a court action despite an arbitration clause:
- The court must decline jurisdiction
- Unless the agreement is:
- Null
- Void
- Inoperative
- Incapable of being performed
3. Statutory Basis
Article 13 of Bahrain Arbitration Law:
- Mirrors Article 8 of the Model Law
- Requires courts to:
- Stay proceedings
- Refer parties to arbitration
4. Conditions for Enforcement
Bahraini courts enforce arbitration agreements if:
(1) Valid Agreement Exists
- Must be:
- In writing
- Clearly expressed
(2) Arbitrable Subject Matter
- Dispute must be capable of arbitration
(3) No Public Policy Violation
- Agreement must not violate:
- Bahraini public policy
5. Kompetenz-Kompetenz Principle
Bahrain recognizes:
- Tribunal’s power to rule on its own jurisdiction
Courts:
- Conduct only prima facie review
- Leave detailed jurisdictional issues to arbitral tribunal
6. Judicial Approach in Bahrain
Bahraini courts typically:
- Interpret arbitration clauses broadly
- Favor validity over invalidity
- Minimize intervention
7. Key Case Laws (International & Persuasive)
Because of limited published Bahraini decisions, courts rely on international jurisprudence.
1. Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation v Privalov
Principle:
- Strong presumption in favor of arbitration
- Clauses interpreted liberally
Relevance:
- Influences Bahraini courts’ pro-enforcement approach
2. Prima Paint Corp v Flood & Conklin Mfg Co
Principle:
- Established separability doctrine
- Arbitration clause survives contract invalidity
Relevance:
- Applied in Bahrain under Model Law principles
3. Kompetenz-Kompetenz doctrine case law
Principle:
- Tribunal decides its own jurisdiction first
Relevance:
- Limits court interference in Bahrain
4. Albon v Naza Motor Trading Sdn Bhd
Principle:
- Courts may refuse enforcement where:
- No real consent to arbitration
Relevance:
- Ensures validity requirement
5. Sulamérica CIA Nacional de Seguros SA v Enesa Engenharia SA
Principle:
- Validity of arbitration agreement depends on governing law
Relevance:
- Helps Bahraini courts assess enforceability
6. National Navigation Co v Endesa Generacion SA
Principle:
- Courts should stay proceedings in favor of arbitration unless clause is clearly invalid
Relevance:
- Reinforces mandatory referral
8. Grounds for Refusal
Bahraini courts may refuse enforcement if:
(A) Invalid Agreement
- Lack of consent
- Uncertainty
(B) Incapacity
- Party lacks legal capacity
(C) Non-Arbitrable Subject Matter
- Criminal or family law disputes
(D) Public Policy Violation
- Contrary to fundamental principles
9. Practical Scenarios
Scenario 1:
- Valid arbitration clause + court case filed
✔ Court stays proceedings
Scenario 2:
- Clause unclear or pathological
⚠ Court may examine validity
Scenario 3:
- Fraud allegation in main contract
✔ Arbitration clause still enforced (separability)
10. Drafting Recommendations
To ensure enforceability:
(1) Clear Language
- “All disputes shall be referred to arbitration”
(2) Specify:
- Seat
- Governing law
- Institution (optional)
(3) Avoid:
- Ambiguous or contradictory clauses
11. Relationship with Public Policy & Sharia
Courts may refuse enforcement if:
- Agreement involves:
- Illegal subject matter
- Serious violation of Sharia principles
But:
- Applied narrowly
12. Conclusion
The enforcement of arbitration agreements in Bahrain is characterized by:
- Strong judicial support
- Minimal court interference
- Alignment with international standards
Bahraini courts generally compel arbitration unless clear invalidity exists, ensuring predictability and confidence for international parties.

comments